Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21577118›Full record

GuidelineGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2011

Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Jill S Goldman, Susan E Hahn, Jennifer Williamson Catania, Susan LaRusse-Eckert, Melissa Barber Butson, Malia Rumbaugh, Michelle N Strecker, J Scott Roberts, Wylie Burke, Richard Mayeux and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 170 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Psychological impacts of APOE genotype disclosure among Latinos in New York City: a randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A randomized noninferiority trial of condensed protocols for genetic risk disclosure of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2015
    Trial
  11. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lecanemab use for early Alzheimer disease in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Practice Recommendations for Genetic Testing of Ataxias.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Review

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jill S GoldmanDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. jg2673@columbia.edu [corrected]
Susan E Hahn
Jennifer Williamson Catania
Susan LaRusse-Eckert
Melissa Barber Butson
Malia Rumbaugh
Michelle N Strecker
J Scott Roberts
Wylie Burke
Richard Mayeux
Thomas Bird
American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Funding

Satellite Diagnostic and Treatment Clinic CoreP50AG008702 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 1989 to 2019
$46.3M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG008702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer disease is the most common cause of dementia. It occurs worldwide and affects all ethnic groups. The incidence of Alzheimer disease is increasing due, in part, to increased life expectancy and the aging baby boomer generation. The average lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer disease is 10-12%. This risk at least doubles with the presence of a first-degree relative with the disorder. Despite its limited utility, patients express concern over their risk and, in some instances, request testing. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that testing individuals for apolipoprotein E can be valuable and safe in certain contexts. However, because of the complicated genetic nature of the disorder, few clinicians are prepared to address the genetic risks of Alzheimer disease with their patients. Given the increased awareness in family history thanks to family history campaigns, the increasing incidence of Alzheimer disease, and the availability of direct to consumer testing, patient requests for information is increasing. This practice guideline provides clinicians with a framework for assessing their patients' genetic risk for Alzheimer disease, identifying which individuals may benefit from genetic testing, and providing the key elements of genetic counseling for AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID21577118
PMCPMC3326653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.