Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21577022›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2011

Why doesn't the brain lose weight, when obese people diet?

Achim Peters, Anja Bosy-Westphal, Britta Kubera, Dirk Langemann, Kristin Goele, Wiebke Later, Martin Heller, Christian Hubold, Manfred James Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Sepsis as CNS-governed metabolic triage.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The brain's supply and demand in obesity.Frontiers in neuroenergetics · 2012
    Article
  12. The selfish brain: stress and eating behavior.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  13. Does sugar addiction really cause obesity?Frontiers in neuroenergetics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Achim PetersMedical Clinic I, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. achim.peters@uk-sh.de
Anja Bosy-Westphal
Britta Kubera
Dirk Langemann
Kristin Goele
Wiebke Later
Martin Heller
Christian Hubold
Manfred James Müller
Kiel University · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs has been shown recently, obesity is associated with brain volume deficits. We here used an interventional study design to investigate whether the brain shrinks after caloric restriction in obesity. To elucidate mechanisms of neuroprotection we assessed brain-pull competence, i.e. the brain's ability to properly demand energy from the body.

methodsIn 52 normal-weight and 42 obese women (before and after ≈10% weight loss) organ masses of brain, liver and kidneys (magnetic resonance imaging), fat (air displacement plethysmography) and muscle mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were assessed. Body metabolism was measured by indirect calorimetry. To investigate how energy is allocated between brain and body, we used reference data obtained in the field of comparative biology. We calculated the distance between each woman and a reference mammal of comparable size in a brain-body plot and named the distance 'encephalic measure'. To elucidate how the brain protects its mass, we measured fasting insulin, since 'cerebral insulin suppression' has been shown to function as a brain-pull mechanism.

resultsBrain mass was equal in normal-weight and obese women (1,441.8 ± 14.6 vs. 1,479.2 ± 12.8 g; n.s.) and was unaffected by weight loss (1,483.8 ± 12.7 g; n.s.). In contrast, masses of muscle, fat, liver and kidneys decreased by 3-18% after weight loss (all p < 0.05). The encephalic measure was lower in obese than normal-weight women (5.8 ± 0.1 vs. 7.4 ± 0.1; p < 0.001). Weight loss increased the encephalic measure to 6.3 ± 0.1 (p < 0.001). Insulin concentrations were inversely related to the encephalic measure (r = -0.382; p < 0.001).

conclusionBrain mass is normal in obese women and is protected during caloric restriction. Our data suggest that neuroprotection during caloric restriction is mediated by a competent brain-pull exerting cerebral insulin suppression.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDiet, ReducingEnergy MetabolismAdipose TissueAdultAnimalsBrainCalorimetry, IndirectCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInsulinKidneyLiverMuscle, SkeletalObesityInsulin

Identifiers

PMID21577022
PMCPMC6444703
OpenAlexW2116375109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.