Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21576262›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2011

CpG islands and the regulation of transcription.

Aimée M Deaton, Adrian Bird

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,678 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,678citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,678 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3,188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multiscale modeling primer: Focus on chromatin and epigenetics.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fluorescent Analysis of KBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,618 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aimée M DeatonThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Adrian Bird
University of Edinburgh · GBWellcome Centre for Cell Biology · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate CpG islands (CGIs) are short interspersed DNA sequences that deviate significantly from the average genomic pattern by being GC-rich, CpG-rich, and predominantly nonmethylated. Most, perhaps all, CGIs are sites of transcription initiation, including thousands that are remote from currently annotated promoters. Shared DNA sequence features adapt CGIs for promoter function by destabilizing nucleosomes and attracting proteins that create a transcriptionally permissive chromatin state. Silencing of CGI promoters is achieved through dense CpG methylation or polycomb recruitment, again using their distinctive DNA sequence composition. CGIs are therefore generically equipped to influence local chromatin structure and simplify regulation of gene activity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsChromatinCpG IslandsDNA MethylationGene SilencingHumansPolycomb-Group ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRepressor ProteinsTranscription Initiation SiteChromatinPolycomb-Group ProteinsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21576262
PMCPMC3093116
OpenAlexW2099343472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.