Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21575645›Full record

ReviewMutation research2012

Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability.

John P Murnane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Extrachromosomal DNA and cancer: function, formation, and clinical implications.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  6. Decoding the mechanisms behind second primary cancers.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Carcinogenesis trajectories.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extrachromosomal DNA in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. cGAS: action in the nucleus.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John P MurnaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-1331, USA. jmurnane@radonc.ucsf.edu
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Chromosome instability resulting from double-strand breaks near telomeresR01CA120205 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MURNANE, JOHN P. · 2006 to 2015
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA120205NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ends of chromosomes are composed of a short repeat sequence and associated proteins that together form a cap, called a telomere, that keeps the ends from appearing as double-strand breaks (DSBs) and prevents chromosome fusion. The loss of telomeric repeat sequences or deficiencies in telomeric proteins can result in chromosome fusion and lead to chromosome instability. The similarity between chromosome rearrangements resulting from telomere loss and those found in cancer cells implicates telomere loss as an important mechanism for the chromosome instability contributing to human cancer. Telomere loss in cancer cells can occur through gradual shortening due to insufficient telomerase, the protein that maintains telomeres. However, cancer cells often have a high rate of spontaneous telomere loss despite the expression of telomerase, which has been proposed to result from a combination of oncogene-mediated replication stress and a deficiency in DSB repair in telomeric regions. Chromosome fusion in mammalian cells primarily involves nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which is the major form of DSB repair. Chromosome fusion initiates chromosome instability involving breakage-fusion-bridge (B/F/B) cycles, in which dicentric chromosomes form bridges and break as the cell attempts to divide, repeating the process in subsequent cell cycles. Fusion between sister chromatids results in large inverted repeats on the end of the chromosome, which amplify further following additional B/F/B cycles. B/F/B cycles continue until the chromosome acquires a new telomere, most often by translocation of the end of another chromosome. The instability is not confined to a chromosome that loses its telomere, because the instability is transferred to the chromosome donating a translocation. Moreover, the amplified regions are unstable and form extrachromosomal DNA that can reintegrate at new locations. Knowledge concerning the factors promoting telomere loss and its consequences is therefore important for understanding chromosome instability in human cancer.

Indexed as

Chromosomal InstabilityTelomere ShorteningDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHumansNeoplasmsRecombinational DNA RepairTelomeraseTelomereTelomere-Binding ProteinsTranslocation, GeneticTelomeraseTelomere-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21575645
PMCPMC3178001
OpenAlexW2031187412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.