Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21573997›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2011

Mechanical properties and tissue reinforcement of polypropylene grafts used for pelvic floor repair--an experimental study.

M Potic, I Ignjatovic, V Savic, P Djekic, G Radenkovic

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M PoticUrology Clinic, University Clinical Center Nis, Hajduk Stanka 8/49, 18 000 Nis, Serbia. pota@medianis.net
I Ignjatovic
V Savic
P Djekic
G Radenkovic

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough grafts can be made from the same materials, the final weave of the product may play a role in the ultimate outcomes or complications. The aim of this experimental study is to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of the meshes and their influence on biological characteristics as well.

methodsFull-thickness abdominal wall defect with respect to the peritoneum was primary repaired in 144 male Wister rats using the overlay technique. Monofilament, multifilament and coated polypropylene grafts were used for the repairs. Graft shrinkage, thickness and tensile strength of the explants were analysed after 3 and 6 weeks.

resultsMonofilament grafts showed the highest shrinkage level of 11.97-18% during the investigated period. The thickness of monofilament explants increased gradually, with a maximum of 25.35% after 6 weeks. Multifilament and collagen explants did swell more rapidly in the third week, decreasing thereafter to 19.63-23.04% above the pre-implantation values after 6 weeks. The tensile strength showed a gradual increase over the course of the experiment in all groups.

conclusionAfter graft stabilisation, all samples had similar strength, regardless of the significant differences in the pre-implantation values of graft strength.

Indexed as

ElasticitySurgical MeshTensile StrengthAbdominal WallAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHernia, AbdominalMaleMaterials TestingPelvic FloorPolypropylenesRatsRats, WistarStatistics, NonparametricBiocompatible MaterialsPolypropylenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.