Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21573947›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2011

Will polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostics improve outcome in septic patients? A clinical view.

Mathias W Pletz, Nele Wellinghausen, Tobias Welte

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04178382 (Effect of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a on the Early Anti-infective Schemes in Patients With Open Air Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04178382 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of PCR-CRISPR/Cas12a on the Early Anti-infective Schemes in Patients With Open Air Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese Medical AssociationRan2019 to 2020Enrolled146ConditionsSevere SepsisArmsPCR-CRISPR/Cas12a detection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Severe pneumonia in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mathias W PletzDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. mathias.pletz@med.uni-jena.de
Nele Wellinghausen
Tobias Welte
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMVZ Labor Ravensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques allow more rapid and sensitive detection of pathogens compared with conventional blood culture. Nevertheless, the climate of opinion of relevant studies is that currently PCR can supplement but not replace blood culture. In numerous studies, combined detection rate of both methods was significantly higher compared with PCR or blood culture alone. Also, complete determination of antibiotic resistance can currently be performed only by blood culture. Further increase of the panel of multiplex PCR is complicated, because the vast majority of sepsis pathogens are already included, primer interactions leading to primer heteromers limit the amount of targets detectable within one PCR tube, and an array of too many individual PCR reactions for investigation of a single specimen leads to high cost and workload. Except for diagnostics of patients in whom unusual, not culturable, or fastidious pathogens are detected more often, such as immunosuppressed patients with suspected parasitic infection, etc., it might even not be necessary to further increase the spectrum of detectable species. If the primary aim of PCR diagnostics is to decrease inappropriate empirical treatment and improve patient outcome, detection should focus on those pathogens or resistance determinants that are not covered by guideline-recommended treatment regimens and that have been identified as the major cause of inappropriate treatment according to current studies. In our opinion, such a narrower assay is more cost effective, may achieve higher accuracy due to reduced intratest interference, and would better address current and emerging clinical needs.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsClinical Laboratory TechniquesFalse Positive ReactionsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPractice Guidelines as TopicSepsisAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID21573947
OpenAlexW2049247663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.