ArticleSurgical endoscopy2011
Is Toupet fundoplication the procedure of choice for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease? Results of a prospective randomized experimental trial comparing three major antireflux operations in a porcine model.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most common dysfunctions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. It interferes with quality of life and is a risk factor for the development of adenocarcinoma in the lower esophagus. Laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment of GERD, but the physiologic mechanisms of the different available procedures had not been investigated to date.
methodsIn this study, 28 German Landrace pigs underwent baseline manometry and 24-h pH monitoring followed by myotomy to induce reflux esophagitis. After new-onset reflux was proved, the pigs were randomized to groups based on four treatments: total fundoplication, anterior hemifundoplication, posterior hemifundoplication, and control. On days 10 and 60 after the intervention, the effectiveness of the different fundoplication modifications was compared with that of the control subjects by 24-h pH monitoring manometry. Finally, the pigs were killed, after which the minimum volume and pressure required to breach the gastroesophageal junction were recorded.
resultsAfter myotomy, a significant increase in the reflux could be confirmed. The findings after fundoplication showed a significant decrease in the fraction of time that the pH fell below four and an increase in the vector volume compared with the measurement after myotomy. Total fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication were highly effective, whereas measurements after anterior fundoplication still showed increased fraction times. Pharmacologic stimulation with pentagastrin showed an increase in the vector volume of the esophageal sphincter.
conclusionsTotal fundoplication and posterior hemifundoplication are potent operations for the treatment of GERD. Anterior hemifundoplication reduces the reflux as well, but the effects are significantly less than with total and posterior fundoplication. Pharmacologic stimulation showed excellent results after posterior hemifundoplication, and a tendency to overcorrection was shown after total fundoplication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.