Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21573167›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Olfactory and visuospatial learning and memory performance in two strains of Alzheimer's disease model mice--a longitudinal study.

Matthew Phillips, Erik Boman, Hanna Osterman, David Willhite, Matthias Laska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Alleviates Expression of AβJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cortical odor processing in health and disease.Progress in brain research · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew PhillipsDepartment of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Erik Boman
Hanna Osterman
David Willhite
Matthias Laska

Funding

INTEGRATIVE MECHANISMS OF CORTICAL NEURONSR01DC000086 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPHERD, GORDON · 1989 to 2010
$3.6M
Transsynaptic Tracing of Olfactory Bulb Input to the Olfactory CortexR03DC008874 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLHITE, DAVID C. · 2007 to 2009
$248k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000086NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC008874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a longitudinal study design, two strains of Alzheimer's disease (AD) model mice, one expressing β-amyloid plaques and one expressing Tau protein-associated neurofibrillary tangles were assessed for olfactory and visuospatial learning and memory and their performance compared to that of age-matched controls. No significant difference between AD and control mice was found in the initial set of olfactory tasks performed at 6 months of age whereas both strains of AD mice performed significantly poorer than the controls in visuospatial learning at this age. Subsequent tests performed on the same individual animals at 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 18 months of age also failed to find systematic differences in olfactory performance between AD and control mice. In contrast, the AD mice performed consistently poorer than the controls in visuospatial re-learning tests performed at these ages. With most olfactory tasks, both AD and control mice displayed a marked decrease in performance between testing at 15 and 18 months of age. These results show that the two strains of AD model mice do not display an olfactory impairment in a time course consistent with human AD, but are impaired in visuospatial capabilities. The marked age-related changes observed with the olfactory tasks in both AD and control mice suggest that the observed lack of an AD-related olfactory impairment is not due to an insensitivity of the tests employed. Rather, they suggest that the olfactory system of the two AD mouse model strains may be surprisingly robust against AD-typical neuropathologies.

Indexed as

AgingAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHabituation, PsychophysiologicLongitudinal StudiesMemoryMiceMice, Inbred StrainsOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysPhysical StimulationTask Performance and AnalysisVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID21573167
PMCPMC3088679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.