Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21572827›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health insights2008

Entitlement to sickness benefits in sweden: the social insurance officers experiences.

Elsy Söderberg, Ulrika Müssener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health insights, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elsy SöderbergDivision of Social Medicine and Public Health Science, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden. Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Science, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Ulrika Müssener

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial insurance offices (SIOs) handle a wide range of complex assessments of the entitlement to sickness benefits for an increasing number of clients on sick leave and consequently, the demands on the SIOs have increased considerably.

aimTo gain deeper knowledge of the problems experienced by the SIOs in their work associated with entitlement to sickness benefits.

methodA descriptive and explorative qualitative approach was used to analyse data from two focus-group interviews, including six participants in each group.

resultsThe participants discussed different dilemmas in regard to; physicians' responsibility for issuing sickness certificates, interactions with the insured individuals, disclosure of decisions, communications with medical consultants, documentation of sickness benefit claims, threats in the workplace, as well as their own competence. The SIOs regarded incomplete information on sickness certificates as a main problem, because they frequently had to contact the client and the physicians who issued the certificates in order to obtain further details, leading to delays in the decision-making whether to grant sickness benefits.

conclusionsMore knowledge regarding SIOs work is required to improve the methods used in the sickness insurance system and to ensure adequate training of new staff members.

Indexed as

assessmentclientmedical consultantssickness benefitsocial insurance officer

Identifiers

PMID21572827
PMCPMC3091338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.