Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21572509›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2011

SIVQ-aided laser capture microdissection: A tool for high-throughput expression profiling.

Jason Hipp, Jerome Cheng, Jeffrey C Hanson, Wusheng Yan, Phil Taylor, Nan Hu, Jaime Rodriguez-Canales, Jennifer Hipp, Michael A Tangrea, Michael R Emmert-Buck and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of Antigen Retrieval on Genomic DNA From Immunodissected Samples.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SIVQ-LCM protocol for the ArcturusXT instrument.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Image microarrays (IMA): Digital pathology's missing tool.Journal of pathology informatics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jason HippDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Division of Pathology Informatics, M4233 Med Sci I, 1301 Catherine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0602, USA.
Jerome Cheng
Jeffrey C Hanson
Wusheng Yan
Phil Taylor
Nan Hu
Jaime Rodriguez-Canales
Jennifer Hipp
Michael A Tangrea
Michael R Emmert-Buck
Ulysses Balis
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics

Funding

Inflammation and the Response to InjuryU54GM062119 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TOMPKINS, RONALD GARY · 2001 to 2010
$78.6M
Technology DevelopmentZIABC010729 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI EMMERT-BUCK, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2014
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM062119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaser capture microdissection (LCM) facilitates procurement of defined cell populations for study in the context of histopathology. The morphologic assessment step in the LCM procedure is time consuming and tedious, thus restricting the utility of the technology for large applications.

resultsHere, we describe the use of Spatially Invariant Vector Quantization (SIVQ) for histological analysis and LCM. Using SIVQ, we selected vectors as morphologic predicates that were representative of normal epithelial or cancer cells and then searched for phenotypically similar cells across entire tissue sections. The selected cells were subsequently auto-microdissected and the recovered RNA was analyzed by expression microarray. Gene expression profiles from SIVQ-LCM and standard LCM-derived samples demonstrated highly congruous signatures, confirming the equivalence of the differing microdissection methods.

conclusionSIVQ-LCM improves the work-flow of microdissection in two significant ways. First, the process is transformative in that it shifts the pathologist's role from technical execution of the entire microdissection to a limited-contact supervisory role, enabling large-scale extraction of tissue by expediting subsequent semi-autonomous identification of target cell populations. Second, this work-flow model provides an opportunity to systematically identify highly constrained cell populations and morphologically consistent regions within tissue sections. Integrating SIVQ with LCM in a single environment provides advanced capabilities for efficient and high-throughput histological-based molecular studies.

Indexed as

Laser capture microdissectionmicroarraySpatially Invariant Vector Quantization

Identifiers

PMID21572509
PMCPMC3073068
OpenAlexW1986961037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.