ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011
Medical device recalls and transparency in the UK.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How does medical device regulation perform in the United States and the European union? A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2012Pooled it
- Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Trial
- Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process.BMJ open · 2017Review
- Comparison of rates of safety issues and reporting of trial outcomes for medical devices approved in the European Union and United States: cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Article
- Regulatory approval of new medical devices: cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Review
- New risks inadequately managed: the case of smart implants and medical device regulation.Law, innovation and technology · 2015Article
- Improving medical device regulation: the United States and Europe in perspective.The Milbank quarterly · 2014Article
- Biomarker patents for diagnostics: problem or solution?Nature biotechnology · 2012Article
- Medical device regulation: time to improve performance.PLoS medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21572136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.