ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011
Out of joint: the story of the ASR.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Common elective orthopaedic procedures and their clinical effectiveness: umbrella review of level 1 evidence.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Appraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Pooled it
- Primary hip replacement prostheses and their evidence base: systematic review of literature.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Pooled it
- Comparative assessment of implantable hip devices with different bearing surfaces: systematic appraisal of evidence.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Pooled it
- Despite higher revision rate, MoM large-head THA offers better clinical scores than HR: 14-year results from a randomized controlled trial involving 48 patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Trial
- Scoping review on regulation, implementation and postmarket surveillance of medical devices.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Case Report on a Fractured Ceramic Bearing Surface Following Total Hip Replacement and a Short Review on the Mechanisms of Liner Fracture.Reports (MDPI) · 2024Article
- From embodiment to evidence: The harmful intersection of poor regulation of medical implants and obstructed narratives in embodied experiences of failed metal-on-metal hips.Health (London, England : 1997) · 2024Article
- [10 Years of the German Arthroplasty Registry-EPRD: what has been achieved?]Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Medical device regulation (MDR) in health technology enterprises - perspectives of managers and regulatory professionals.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Identification of implant outliers in joint replacement registries.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- Response to letter: Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin versus New Oral Anticoagulants to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Living with a recalled implant: a qualitative study of patients' experiences with ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty.Patient safety in surgery · 2021Article
- No association between blood count levels and whole-blood cobalt and chromium levels in 1,900 patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.Acta orthopaedica · 2020Article
- Impact of Health Care Reform on Technology and Innovation.Hand clinics · 2020Review
- Changing Device Regulations in the European Union: Impact on Research, Innovation and Clinical Practice.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Patient-reported outcomes in hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a register-based matched cohort study of 726 patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2019Article
- Will registries slow down or accelerate innovation?EFORT open reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21572134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.