Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21572125›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2011

Assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor and K-ras mutation status in cytological stained smears of non-small cell lung cancer patients: correlation with clinical outcomes.

Maria D Lozano, Javier J Zulueta, Jose I Echeveste, Alfonso Gúrpide, Luis M Seijo, Salvador Martín-Algarra, Anabel Del Barrio, Ruben Pio, Miguel Angel Idoate, Tania Labiano and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Correlations Study BetweenFrontiers in oncology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Concurrent fine needle aspirations and core needle biopsies: a comparative study of substrates for next-generation sequencing in solid organ malignancies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017
    Article
  14. Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Total and mutated EGFR quantification in cell-free DNA from non-small cell lung cancer patients detects tumor heterogeneity and presents prognostic value.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria D LozanoDepartment of Pathology, University Clinic of Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. mdlozano@unav.es
Javier J Zulueta
Jose I Echeveste
Alfonso Gúrpide
Luis M Seijo
Salvador Martín-Algarra
Anabel Del Barrio
Ruben Pio
Miguel Angel Idoate
Tania Labiano
Jose Luis Perez-Gracia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and K-ras mutations guide treatment selection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Although mutation status is routinely assessed in biopsies, cytological specimens are frequently the only samples available. We determined EGFR and K-ras mutations in cytological samples.

methodsDNA was extracted from 150 consecutive samples, including 120 Papanicolau smears (80%), 10 cell blocks (7%), nine fresh samples (6%), six ThinPrep® tests (4%), and five body cavity fluids (3.3%). Papanicolau smears were analyzed when they had >50% malignant cells. Polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing of exons 18-21 of EGFR and exon 2 of K-ras were performed. EGFR mutations were simultaneously determined in biopsies and cytological samples from 20 patients. Activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was assessed.

resultsThe cytological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 110 samples (73%) and nonadenocarcinoma in 40 (27%) samples. EGFR mutations were identified in 26 samples (17%) and K-ras mutations were identified in 18 (12%) samples. EGFR and K-ras mutations were mutually exclusive. In EGFR-mutated cases, DNA was obtained from stained smears in 24 cases (92%), pleural fluid in one case (4%), and cell block in one case (4%). The response rate to EGFR TKIs in patients harboring mutations was 75%. The mutation status was identical in patients who had both biopsies and cytological samples analyzed.

conclusionAssessment of EGFR and K-ras mutations in cytological samples is feasible and comparable with biopsy results, making individualized treatment selection possible for NSCLC patients from whom tumor biopsies are not available.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmEnzyme InhibitorsErbB ReceptorsExonsFemaleGenes, rasHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleAntineoplastic AgentsDNA, NeoplasmEnzyme InhibitorsErbB Receptorsras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21572125
PMCPMC3228207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.