Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21572095›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2011

Discovery of highly divergent repeat landscapes in snake genomes using high-throughput sequencing.

Todd A Castoe, Kathryn T Hall, Marcel L Guibotsy Mboulas, Wanjun Gu, A P Jason de Koning, Samuel E Fox, Alexander W Poole, Vijetha Vemulapalli, Juan M Daza, Todd Mockler and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome Evolution and the Future of Phylogenomics of Non-Avian Reptiles.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Tracking the recruitment and evolution of snake toxins using the evolutionary context provided by theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Transposable Elements and Stress in Vertebrates: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Todd A CastoeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA.
Kathryn T Hall
Marcel L Guibotsy Mboulas
Wanjun Gu
A P Jason de Koning
Samuel E Fox
Alexander W Poole
Vijetha Vemulapalli
Juan M Daza
Todd Mockler
Eric N Smith
Cédric Feschotte
David D Pollock
University of Colorado Denver · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversidad de Antioquia · COOregon State University · USSoutheast University · CN

Funding

Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
Modeling evolution of functional context in proteinsR01GM083127 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI POLLOCK, DAVID D · 2009 to 2019
$2.7M
Human DNA transposons: evolutionary history and genomic impactR01GM077582 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2007 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM083127NIGMS NIH HHS GM77582NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077582NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083127NLM NIH HHS LM009451NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a comprehensive assessment of genomic repeat content in two snake genomes, the venomous copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix) and the Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus). These two genomes are both relatively small (∼1.4 Gb) but have surprisingly extensive differences in the abundance and expansion histories of their repeat elements. In the python, the readily identifiable repeat element content is low (21%), similar to bird genomes, whereas that of the copperhead is higher (45%), similar to mammalian genomes. The copperhead's greater repeat content arises from the recent expansion of many different microsatellites and transposable element (TE) families, and the copperhead had 23-fold greater levels of TE-related transcripts than the python. This suggests the possibility that greater TE activity in the copperhead is ongoing. Expansion of CR1 LINEs in the copperhead genome has resulted in TE-mediated microsatellite expansion ("microsatellite seeding") at a scale several orders of magnitude greater than previously observed in vertebrates. Snakes also appear to be prone to horizontal transfer of TEs, particularly in the copperhead lineage. The reason that the copperhead has such a small genome in the face of so much recent expansion of repeat elements remains an open question, although selective pressure related to extreme metabolic performance is an obvious candidate. TE activity can affect gene regulation as well as rates of recombination and gene duplication, and it is therefore possible that TE activity played a role in the evolution of major adaptations in snakes; some evidence suggests this may include the evolution of venom repertoires.

Indexed as

GenomeAgkistrodonAnimalsBiological EvolutionBoidaeDNA Transposable ElementsGene DuplicationGene Transfer, HorizontalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID21572095
PMCPMC3157835
OpenAlexW2135907561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.