"Non-physician clinicians" in low income countries.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Understanding the scope of practice of physician associate/physician associate comparable professions using the World Health Organization global competency and outcomes framework for universal health coverage.Human resources for health · 2023
   Article
2. E-Learning for Medical Education in Sub-Saharan Africa and Low-Resource Settings: Viewpoint.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019
   Article
3. The Specialist Surgeon Workforce in East, Central and Southern Africa: A Situation Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2016
   Article
4. Snippets.Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A comparison of clinical officers with medical doctors on outcomes of caesarean section in the developing world: meta-analysis of controlled studies.2011

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as