Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21571517›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2011

Protein quality control at the plasma membrane.

Tsukasa Okiyoneda, Pirjo M Apaja, Gergely L Lukacs

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Protein quality control ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. New Therapies to Correct the Cystic Fibrosis Basic Defect.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Protein quality control in the secretory pathway.The Journal of cell biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsukasa OkiyonedaDepartment of Physiology and Groupe de Recherche Axé sur la Structure des Protéines, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Pirjo M Apaja
Gergely L Lukacs
McGill University · CA

Funding

Correction of defective functional expression of CFTR in cystic fibrosisR01DK075302 · NIDDK · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI LUKACS, GERGELY L. · 2006 to 2020
$3.3M
CIHRNIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK075302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular proteostasis (or protein homeostasis) depends on the timely folding and disposal of conformationally damaged polypeptides during their life span at all subcellular locations. This process is particularly important for membrane proteins confined to the cell surface with crucial regulatory role in cellular homoeostasis and intercellular communication. Accumulating evidences indicate that membrane proteins exported from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are subjected to peripheral quality control (QC) along the late secretory and endocytic pathways, as well as at the plasma membrane (PM). Recently identified components of the PM QC recognition and effector mechanisms responsible for ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation of conformationally damaged PM proteins uncovered striking similarities to and differences from that of the ER QC machinery. Possible implications of the peripheral protein QC activity in phenotypic modulation of conformational diseases are also outlined.

Indexed as

Protein TransportAnimalsCell MembraneEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansLysosomesMammalsMembrane ProteinsUbiquitinationYeastsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21571517
PMCPMC3148424
OpenAlexW2091670404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.