Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21570617›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical anesthesia2011

Hemodynamic characteristics of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers.

Michael A Frölich, Alireza Arabshahi, Charles Katholi, Jeevan Prasain, Stephen Barnes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. RemimazolamPeerJ · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Effective remimazolam loading dose for adequate sedation in regional anesthesia.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Refractory septic shock: our updated pragmatic approach.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael A FrölichDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35249-6810, USA. froelich@uab.edu
Alireza Arabshahi
Charles Katholi
Jeevan Prasain
Stephen Barnes
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

WHITE MATTER AND COGNITION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASEM01RR000082 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BYRNE, BARRY J · 1985 to 2009
$29.7M
UAB CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (CCTS) UL1: BPCAUL1RR025777 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2008 to 2011
$22.3M
THE EFFECT OF SEDATION ON PAIN PERCEPTIONK23RR021874 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FROELICH, MICHAEL A · 2006 to 2010
$757k
NCRR NIH HHS K23 RR021874NCRR NIH HHS K23RR021874NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000082NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025777NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo study the effect of intravenous (IV) sedation on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rates (RR) to determine if IV sedatives differ with respect to their effect on BP, HR, and RR.

designProspective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

settingMonitored patient care room at a clinical research center. SUBJECTS: 60 healthy ASA physical status 1 volunteers.

interventionsSubjects were randomized to receive, in increasing doses, one of three IV sedatives: propofol, midazolam, or dexmedetomidine; or saline control. MEASUREMENTS: Blood pressure (systolic, diastolic), HR, and RR were recorded. MAIN

resultsA significant dose-dependent BP reduction occurred with dexmedetomidine and, to a lesser degree, with propofol; and there was good agreement of predicted versus measured drug concentrations for all sedatives. Blood pressure and HR of participants who received midazolam did not change.

conclusionsWhen administered in sedative doses, dexmedetomidine and, to a lesser extent, midazolam, reduces BP in a dose-dependent fashion. Dexmedetomidine also reduces HR. Midazolam does not affect BP or HR.

Indexed as

AdultBlood PressureDexmedetomidineFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMidazolamMiddle AgedPropofolProspective StudiesRespirationSingle-Blind MethodDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamPropofol

Identifiers

PMID21570617
PMCPMC3828053
OpenAlexW2068469916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.