Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21569360›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2011

Dynamic reprogramming of chromatin accessibility during Drosophila embryo development.

Sean Thomas, Xiao-Yong Li, Peter J Sabo, Richard Sandstrom, Robert E Thurman, Theresa K Canfield, Erika Giste, William Fisher, Ann Hammonds, Susan E Celniker and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. regCNN: identifyingComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sean ThomasDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Foege S310A, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Box 355065, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Xiao-Yong Li
Peter J Sabo
Richard Sandstrom
Robert E Thurman
Theresa K Canfield
Erika Giste
William Fisher
Ann Hammonds
Susan E Celniker
Mark D Biggin
John A Stamatoyannopoulos
University of Washington · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USSeattle Pacific University · US

Funding

Patterned Gene Expression in Drosophila DevelopmentR01GM076655 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CELNIKER, SUSAN E · 2006 to 2020
$6.8M
Computational discovery of cis-regulatory sequencesR01GM071923 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, JOHN A · 2004 to 2007
$2.2M
UW/FHCRC TRAINING IN HEMOGLOBINPATHIES, GENOMICS AND PROTEOMICST90HG004007 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAMATOYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE · 2006 to 2010
$327k
NHGRI NIH HHS T90 HG 004007-04NIGMS NIH HHS GM704403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076655NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM71923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of complex organisms is believed to involve progressive restrictions in cellular fate. Understanding the scope and features of chromatin dynamics during embryogenesis, and identifying regulatory elements important for directing developmental processes remain key goals of developmental biology.

resultsWe used in vivo DNaseI sensitivity to map the locations of regulatory elements, and explore the changing chromatin landscape during the first 11 hours of Drosophila embryonic development. We identified thousands of conserved, developmentally dynamic, distal DNaseI hypersensitive sites associated with spatial and temporal expression patterning of linked genes and with large regions of chromatin plasticity. We observed a nearly uniform balance between developmentally up- and down-regulated DNaseI hypersensitive sites. Analysis of promoter chromatin architecture revealed a novel role for classical core promoter sequence elements in directing temporally regulated chromatin remodeling. Another unexpected feature of the chromatin landscape was the presence of localized accessibility over many protein-coding regions, subsets of which were developmentally regulated or associated with the transcription of genes with prominent maternal RNA contributions in the blastoderm.

conclusionsOur results provide a global view of the rich and dynamic chromatin landscape of early animal development, as well as novel insights into the organization of developmentally regulated chromatin features.

Indexed as

Developmental BiologyGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenome, InsectAnimalsBlastodermBody PatterningChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDeoxyribonuclease IDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGenetic LociGenomicsPromoter Regions, GeneticChromatinDeoxyribonuclease IDrosophila ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21569360
PMCPMC3219966
OpenAlexW2169269276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.