Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21569309›Full record

Trial reportTrials2011

Strategic use of new generation antidepressants for depression: SUN(^_^)D study protocol.

Toshi A Furukawa, Tatsuo Akechi, Shinji Shimodera, Mitsuhiko Yamada, Kazuhira Miki, Norio Watanabe, Masatoshi Inagaki, Naohiro Yonemoto

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01109693 (Strategic Use of New Generation Antidepressants for Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01109693 phase4completednot on this map

Strategic Use of New Generation Antidepressants for Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorKyoto UniversityRan2010 to 2015Enrolled2,011ConditionsUnipolar Major Depressive EpisodeArmsSertraline, Mirtazapine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Toshi A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Japan. furukawa@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Tatsuo Akechi
Shinji Shimodera
Mitsuhiko Yamada
Kazuhira Miki
Norio Watanabe
Masatoshi Inagaki
Naohiro Yonemoto
Nagoya City University · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPKōchi University · JPKyoto University · JPMiwa Internal Medicine Clinic · JPNational Institute of Mental Health · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter more than half a century of modern psychopharmacology, with billions of dollars spent on antidepressants annually world-wide, we lack good evidence to guide our everyday decisions in conducting antidepressant treatment of patients with major depression. First we did not know which antidepressant to use as first line treatment. Second we do not know which dosage we should be aiming at with that antidepressant. Because more than half of the patients with major depression starting treatment do not remit after adequate trial with the first agent, they will need a second line treatment. Dose escalation, augmentation and switching are the three often recommended second line strategies but we do not know which is better than the others. Moreover, we do not know when to start considering this second line treatment.The recently published multiple-treatments meta-analysis of 12 new generation antidepressants has provided some partial answers to the first question. Starting with these findings, this proposed trial aims to establish the optimum 1st line and 2nd line antidepressant treatment strategy among adult patients with a non-psychotic unipolar major depressive episode.

methodsSUN(^_^)D, the Strategic Use of New generation antidepressants for Depression, is an assessor-blinded, parallel-group, multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Step I is a cluster-randomised trial comparing titration up to the minimum vs maximum of the recommended dose range among patients starting with sertraline. The primary outcome is the change in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 scores administered by a blinded rater via telephone at week 1 through 3. Step II is an individually randomised trial comparing staying on sertraline, augmentation of sertraline with mirtazapine, and switching to mirtazapine among patients who have not remitted on the first line treatment by week 3. The primary outcome is the change in the PHQ-9 scores at week 4 through 9. Step III represents a continuation phase to Steps I and II and aims to establish longer-term effectiveness and acceptability of the above-examined treatment strategies up to week 25. The trial is supported by the Grant-in-Aid by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. DISCUSSION: SUN(^_^)D promises to be a pragmatic large trial to answer important clinical questions that every clinician treating patients with major depression faces in his/her daily practices concerning its first- and second-line treatments.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01109693.

Indexed as

Research DesignAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicCluster AnalysisDrug Administration ScheduleDrug SubstitutionFemaleHumansJapanMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMianserinMiddle AgedMirtazapineAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicMianserinMirtazapineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSertraline

Identifiers

PMID21569309
PMCPMC3120681
OpenAlexW2165827913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.