Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21566258›Full record

ReviewAging2011

Disrupting the circadian clock: gene-specific effects on aging, cancer, and other phenotypes.

Elizabeth A Yu, David R Weaver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The ClockJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth A YuDepartment of Neurobiology, MD/PhD Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, 01605, USA.
David R Weaver

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY PROGRAMP30DK032520 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CZECH, MICHAEL P · 1986 to 2010
$14.6M
Mechanisms of Circadian Rhythmicity in CLOCK-Deficient MiceR01NS056125 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI WEAVER, DAVID RAYMOND · 2006 to 2017
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK 32520NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK032520NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS056125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian clock imparts 24-hour rhythmicity on gene expression and cellular physiology in virtually all cells. Disruption of the genes necessary for the circadian clock to function has diverse effects, including aging-related phenotypes. Some circadian clock genes have been described as tumor suppressors, while other genes have less clear functions in aging and cancer. In this Review, we highlight a recent study [Dubrovsky et al., Aging 2: 936-944, 2010] and discuss the much larger field examining the relationship between circadian clock genes, circadian rhythmicity, aging-related phenotypes, and cancer.

Indexed as

AgingCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmGene Expression RegulationHumansLightNeoplasmsPeriodicityPhenotypeTrans-ActivatorsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID21566258
PMCPMC3156599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.