Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21566124›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Extending biochemical databases by metabolomic surveys.

Oliver Fiehn, Dinesh K Barupal, Tobias Kind

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Metabolic Aspects of Lentil-Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemical Discovery in the Era of Metabolomics.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. METLIN: A Tandem Mass Spectral Library of Standards.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Global open data management in metabolomics.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver FiehnUniversity of California Davis Genome Center, Davis, California 95616, USA. ofiehn@ucdavis.edu
Dinesh K Barupal
Tobias Kind

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics can map the large metabolic diversity in species, organs, or cell types. In addition to gains in enzyme specificity, many enzymes have retained substrate and reaction promiscuity. Enzyme promiscuity and the large number of enzymes with unknown enzyme function may explain the presence of a plethora of unidentified compounds in metabolomic studies. Cataloguing the identity and differential abundance of all detectable metabolites in metabolomic repositories may detail which compounds and pathways contribute to vital biological functions. The current status in metabolic databases is reviewed concomitant with tools to map and visualize the metabolome.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAnimalsEnzymesHumansMetabolomeMetabolomicsEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID21566124
PMCPMC3129143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.