Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21565737›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2011

Prognostic value of CT angiography in coronary bypass patients.

Benjamin J W Chow, Osman Ahmed, Gary Small, Abdul-Aziz Alghamdi, Yeung Yam, Li Chen, George A Wells

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Significance of myocardial flow reserve after revascularization.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Utility of nuclear stress imaging in predicting long-term outcomes one-year post CABG Surgery.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Early nuclear stress testing after CABG: The new standard or too soon to tell?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. CT vs SPECT: CT is the first-line test for the diagnosis and prognosis of stable coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2013
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Prognostic value of cardiovascular CT: is coronary artery calcium screening enough? The added value of CCTA.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin J W ChowDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. bchow@ottawaheart.ca
Osman Ahmed
Gary Small
Abdul-Aziz Alghamdi
Yeung Yam
Li Chen
George A Wells
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought the incremental prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients.

backgroundCoronary CTA is a noninvasive and accurate tool for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease, and coronary CTA appears to have prognostic value in patients without previous revascularization. However, the prognostic value of coronary CTA to predict major adverse cardiac events in CABG patients is unclear.

methodsConsecutive CABG patients were prospectively enrolled and cardiac risk was calculated using the National Cholesterol Evaluation Program/Adult Treatment Panel III. Using the severity of native coronary artery disease and graft disease, the number of unprotected coronary territories (UCTs) (0, 1, 2, or 3) was calculated. Patients were followed for cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. All events were confirmed with death certificates or medical records and reviewed by a clinical events committee.

resultsBetween February 2006 and March 2009, 250 consecutive patients were enrolled and followed for a mean of 20.8 ± 10.1 months. At follow-up, 23 patients (9.2%) had major adverse cardiac events (15 cardiac deaths and 8 nonfatal MI). The absence of UCTs conferred a good prognosis with an annual event rate of 2.4%. Conversely, patients with 1, 2, and 3 UCTs had annualized event rates of 5.8%, 11.1%, and 21.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that UCTs (hazard ratio: 2.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.40 to 3.10; p < 0.001) was a predictor of major adverse cardiac events when adjusted for clinical variables. Examining the receiver-operator characteristic curves, the area under the curve increased from 0.61 to 0.76 when UCTs was combined with clinical variables (p = 0.001).

conclusionsAssessing UCTs with coronary CTA appears to have prognostic value in CABG patients and is incremental to clinical variables. Coronary CTA appears to be a promising tool for risk stratification of CABG patients. Further multicenter studies using large CABG cohorts are needed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOntarioPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRegistries

Identifiers

PMID21565737
OpenAlexW1987899790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.