Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21565265›Full record

ReviewGenomics2011

Gene set analysis of genome-wide association studies: methodological issues and perspectives.

Lily Wang, Peilin Jia, Russell D Wolfinger, Xi Chen, Zhongming Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathway Analysis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Genome-Wide Association Studies Identifies Novel Associations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lily WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. lily.wang@vanderbilt.edu
Peilin Jia
Russell D Wolfinger
Xi Chen
Zhongming Zhao
Vanderbilt University · USSAS Institute (United States) · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
Project 6 Interactions of Serotonin and Circadian Signaling NetworksP50MH078028 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SNODDY, JAY R · 2007 to 2011
$9.8M
A genome-wide association study of schizophrenia in IrelandR01MH083094 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI RILEY, BRIEN P · 2008 to 2011
$3.5M
Project 3: Cross Species Characterization of Gene Networks in Acute ResponsesP20AA017828 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2009 to 2012
$2.2M
Integrative statistical models for pathway analysis of GWAS dataR21HG006037 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LILY, ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2013 to 2014
$445k
Generation of Ethanol Response Gene Resource by Large-Scale Data IntegrationR21AA017437 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2008 to 2009
$398k
NCI NIH HHS 5P30CA068485-13NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P30CA68485NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG006037NIAAA NIH HHS P20 AA017828NIAAA NIH HHS P20AA017828NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA017437NIAAA NIH HHS R21AA017437NICHD NIH HHS 5P30 HD015052-25NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD015052NIMH NIH HHS 1P50MH078028-01A1NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH078028NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083094NIMH NIH HHS R01MH083094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that gene set analysis, which tests disease association with genetic variants in a group of functionally related genes, is a promising approach for analyzing and interpreting genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. These approaches aim to increase power by combining association signals from multiple genes in the same gene set. In addition, gene set analysis can also shed more light on the biological processes underlying complex diseases. However, current approaches for gene set analysis are still in an early stage of development in that analysis results are often prone to sources of bias, including gene set size and gene length, linkage disequilibrium patterns and the presence of overlapping genes. In this paper, we provide an in-depth review of the gene set analysis procedures, along with parameter choices and the particular methodology challenges at each stage. In addition to providing a survey of recently developed tools, we also classify the analysis methods into larger categories and discuss their strengths and limitations. In the last section, we outline several important areas for improving the analytical strategies in gene set analysis.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyHumansMultigene FamilyPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID21565265
PMCPMC3852939
OpenAlexW2162960415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.