Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21565196›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2011

Antigen profiles for the quantitative assessment of eosinophils in mouse tissues by flow cytometry.

Kimberly D Dyer, Katia E Garcia-Crespo, Kristin E Killoran, Helene F Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Opposing roles of eosinophils in cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel adherent CD11bOncotarget · 2018
    Article
  12. Eosinophil persistence in vivo and sustained viability ex vivo in response to respiratory challenge with fungal allergens.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transcription Factor Repertoire of Homeostatic Eosinophilopoiesis.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly D DyerEosinophil Biology Section, Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, NIAID, NIH Bethesda, MD, United States. kdyer@niaid.nih.gov
Katia E Garcia-Crespo
Kristin E Killoran
Helene F Rosenberg
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Eosinophils, Inflammation and ImmunityZIAAI000941 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ROSENBERG, HELENE · 2009 to 2020
$8.0M
Biology of the Eosinophilic LeukocyteZ01AI000941 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI ROSENBERG, HELENE · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AI000941Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI000941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of our current understanding of eosinophil-associated pathologies has developed from the use of mouse models. While mouse eosinophils can be readily detected by flow cytometric methods, most studies do not document the efficiency of this process compared to direct counting of stained cells. Our intent was to address this knowledge gap by identifying one or more eosinophil-specific antigen profiles that yielded flow cytometric data that was statistically consistent with direct counts. We found that anti-CD193 (CCR3) and anti-CD125 (IL-5Rα) antibodies were effective at detecting eosinophils in bone marrow of interleukin-5 transgenic mice, but these antibodies under-reported the percent positive cells. In contrast, anti-Siglec F alone or in combination with anti-CD45 can be used for the quantitative detection of eosinophils in mouse bone marrow and spleen. The antigen profile CD45(+)SiglecF(+)CD11c(-) was effective at detecting eosinophils in the lung as well as bone marrow and spleen, and the results obtained correlated with direct morphometric counts under all conditions evaluated (r(2)=0.98-0.99). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic analysis presenting definitive correlations between percent eosinophils detected by cell surface markers and direct counting of stained cells in multiple tissues and at varying degrees of eosinophilia.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntigens, CDEosinophilsFlow CytometryMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAntibodiesAntigens, CD

Identifiers

PMID21565196
PMCPMC3116057
OpenAlexW2093985251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.