ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2011
Consensus 3D model of μ-opioid receptor ligand efficacy based on a quantitative Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of structural factors affecting binding to mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors.Archives of toxicology · 2020Article
- Advances in the Physicochemical Profiling of Opioid Compounds of Therapeutic Interest.ChemistryOpen · 2019Review
- Force Fields for Small Molecules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Predicting opioid receptor binding affinity of pharmacologically unclassified designer substances using molecular docking.PloS one · 2018Article
- Drug Binding Poses Relate Structure with Efficacy in the μ Opioid Receptor.Journal of molecular biology · 2017Article
- Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Article
- Conformational Heterogeneity of Intracellular Loop 3 of the μ-opioid G-protein Coupled Receptor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016Article
- Synthesis, modeling, and pharmacological evaluation of UMB 425, a mixed μ agonist/δ antagonist opioid analgesic with reduced tolerance liabilities.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2013Article
- Molecular details of the activation of the μ opioid receptor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
- Estimation of ligand efficacies of metabotropic glutamate receptors from conformational forces obtained from molecular dynamics simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2013Article
- A DFT and semiempirical model-based study of opioid receptor affinity and selectivity in a group of molecules with a morphine structural core.International journal of medicinal chemistry · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite being studied for over 30 years, a consensus structure-activity relationship (SAR) that encompasses the full range peptidic and nonpeptidic μ-opioid receptor ligands is still not available. To achieve a consensus SAR the Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore (CSP) method was applied to develop a predictive model of the efficacy of μ-opioid receptor ligands. Emphasis was placed on predicting the efficacy of a wide range of agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists as well as understanding their mode of interaction with the receptor. Inclusion of all accessible conformations of each ligand, a central feature of the CSP method, enabled structural features between diverse μ-opioid receptor ligands that dictate efficacy to be identified. The models were validated against a diverse collection of peptidic and nonpeptidic ligands, including benzomorphans, fentanyl (4-anilinopiperidine), methadone (3,3-diphenylpropylamines), etonitazene (benzimidazole derivatives), funaltrexamine (C6-substituted 4,5-epoxymorphinan), and herkinorin. The model predicts (1) that interactions of ligands with the B site, as with the 19-alkyl substituents of oripavines, modulate the extent of agonism; (2) that agonists with long N-substituents, as with fentanyl and N-phenethylnormorphine, can bind in an orientation such that the N substitutent interacts with the B site that also allows the basic N-receptor Asp interaction essential for agonism; and (3) that the μ agonist herkinorin, that lacks a basic nitrogen, binds to the receptor in a manner similar to the traditional opioids via interactions mediated by water or a ion. Importantly, the proposed CSP model can be reconciled with previously published SAR models for the μ receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.