Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21563754›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2011

Consensus 3D model of μ-opioid receptor ligand efficacy based on a quantitative Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore.

Jihyun Shim, Andrew Coop, Alexander D MacKerell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Force Fields for Small Molecules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular details of the activation of the μ opioid receptor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jihyun ShimDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.
Andrew Coop
Alexander D MacKerell
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

OPIOIDS WITH DELTA ANTAGONIST AND MU AGONIST ACTIVITYR01DA013583 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COOP, ANDREW · 2001 to 2012
$2.5M
Reversing the toxic effects of drugs of abuseK02DA019634 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COOP, ANDREW · 2005 to 2009
$528k
NIDA NIH HHS DA13583NIDA NIH HHS DA19634NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA019634NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being studied for over 30 years, a consensus structure-activity relationship (SAR) that encompasses the full range peptidic and nonpeptidic μ-opioid receptor ligands is still not available. To achieve a consensus SAR the Conformationally Sampled Pharmacophore (CSP) method was applied to develop a predictive model of the efficacy of μ-opioid receptor ligands. Emphasis was placed on predicting the efficacy of a wide range of agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists as well as understanding their mode of interaction with the receptor. Inclusion of all accessible conformations of each ligand, a central feature of the CSP method, enabled structural features between diverse μ-opioid receptor ligands that dictate efficacy to be identified. The models were validated against a diverse collection of peptidic and nonpeptidic ligands, including benzomorphans, fentanyl (4-anilinopiperidine), methadone (3,3-diphenylpropylamines), etonitazene (benzimidazole derivatives), funaltrexamine (C6-substituted 4,5-epoxymorphinan), and herkinorin. The model predicts (1) that interactions of ligands with the B site, as with the 19-alkyl substituents of oripavines, modulate the extent of agonism; (2) that agonists with long N-substituents, as with fentanyl and N-phenethylnormorphine, can bind in an orientation such that the N substitutent interacts with the B site that also allows the basic N-receptor Asp interaction essential for agonism; and (3) that the μ agonist herkinorin, that lacks a basic nitrogen, binds to the receptor in a manner similar to the traditional opioids via interactions mediated by water or a ion. Importantly, the proposed CSP model can be reconciled with previously published SAR models for the μ receptor.

Indexed as

LigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationPeptidesProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, Opioid, muStructure-Activity RelationshipThebaineLigandsoripavinePeptidesReceptors, Opioid, muThebaine

Identifiers

PMID21563754
PMCPMC3113728
OpenAlexW1969059134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.