Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21563715›Full record

Trial reportPublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Primary prevention of lead exposure: the Philadelphia lead safe homes study.

Carla Campbell, Mary Tran, Edward Gracely, Naomi Starkey, Hans Kersten, Peter Palermo, Nancy Rothman, Laura Line, Tine Hansen-Turton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Household interventions for preventing domestic lead exposure in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Case Study of Environmental Injustice: The Failure in Flint.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary prevention of lead exposure--blood lead results at age two years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carla CampbellThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ccc57@drexel.edu
Mary Tran
Edward Gracely
Naomi Starkey
Hans Kersten
Peter Palermo
Nancy Rothman
Laura Line
Tine Hansen-Turton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLead exposure in children can lead to neuropsychological impairment. This study tested whether primary prevention interventions in the newborn period prevent elevated blood lead levels (BLLs).

methodsThe Philadelphia Lead Safe Homes (LSH) Study offered parental education, home evaluation, and lead remediation to the families of urban newborns. Households were randomized to a standard lead education group or maintenance education group. We conducted home visits at baseline, six months, and 12 months. To compare BLLs, we identified a matched comparison group.

resultsWe enrolled and randomized 314 newborns in the intervention component; 110 completed the study. There were few significant differences between the randomized groups. In the combined intervention groups, positive results on visual inspection declined from baseline to 12 months (97.0% to 90.6%, p = 0.007). At baseline, 36.9% of homes were above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's lead dust standard, compared with 26.9% at 12 months (p = 0.032), mainly due to a drop in windowsill dust levels. Both groups showed a significant increase in parental scores on a lead education test. Children in the intervention and matched control groups had similar geometric mean initial BLLs (2.6 vs. 2.7, p = 0.477), but a significantly higher percentage of children in the intervention group had an initial blood lead screening compared with those in the matched group (88.9% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.032).

conclusionsA study of primary prevention of lead exposure showed a higher blood lead screening rate for the combined intervention groups and mean BLLs at one year of age not statistically different from the comparison group. Most homes had lead hazards. Lead education significantly increased knowledge.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHousehold WorkHousingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLeadLead PoisoningMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareParentsPhiladelphiaPoverty AreasPrimary PreventionLead

Identifiers

PMID21563715
PMCPMC3072906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.