Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21563155›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Interventions for infantile haemangiomas (strawberry birthmarks) of the skin.

Jo Leonardi-Bee, Kapila Batta, Carol O'Brien, Fiona J Bath-Hextall

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions for vitiligo.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Lasers or light sources for treating port-wine stains.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jo Leonardi-BeeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, UK, NG5 1PB.
Kapila Batta
Carol O'Brien
Fiona J Bath-Hextall
University of Nottingham · GBCochrane · GBWatford General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfantile haemangiomas (also known as strawberry birthmarks) are soft, raised swellings of the skin which are usually uncomplicated and tend to regress spontaneously over time. Some haemangiomas occur in high-risk areas or can develop complications; therefore, intervention may be necessary. Various interventions have been proposed, but it is unclear whether any of these interventions are effective.

objectivesTo assess the effects of interventions for infantile haemangiomas. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases up to March 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Clinical Trials) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database), CINAHL, and reference lists of articles. We also searched online trials registries for ongoing trials and grey literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included children with haemangiomas. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and the full text of publications; extracted data; and assessed risk of bias. MAIN

resultsWe included 4 studies with a total of 271 participants.One randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared pulsed dye laser (PDL) therapy versus the 'wait and see' approach. At one year PDL was significantly more likely to result in complete clearance. The risk ratio (RR) was 6.10 (95% CI [confidence interval] 1.89 to 19.64); however, there was no difference when clearance was defined as 'complete or minimal residual signs'. Redness was significantly less pronounced in the PDL group, but no differences were seen for height or surface area. Significant increases in atrophy and skin hypopigmentation were seen in the PDL group.One very old RCT assessed radiation versus mock-radiation; there was no significant difference in clearance at six years (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.87) between the groups, irrespective of the size of the haemangioma and the skin colour.In one small RCT there was a significantly greater reduction in size of the haemangioma with oral prednisolone compared to intravenous methylprednisolone at three months (mean difference [MD] was 58 mm [95% CI 29.24 to 86.76]), and one year. Similar adverse events occurred in both groups.In another small RCT there was a significant reduction in the surface area of the haemangioma with bleomycin compared to the control (RR 21, 95% CI 1.34 to 328.86). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review has found limited evidence from individual RCTs to support some of the existing interventions (corticosteroid and PDL) for infantile haemangiomas. There is a need for further high-quality RCTs to validate the findings from these studies, and RCTs to assess the effect of other treatments, in particular relating to propranolol.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAntineoplastic AgentsBleomycinChild, PreschoolHemangioma, CapillaryHumansInfantLasers, DyeMethylprednisolonePhotochemotherapyPrednisoloneRadiotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionSkin NeoplasmsAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntineoplastic AgentsBleomycinMethylprednisolonePrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID21563155
OpenAlexW1706779465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.