SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Methotrexate for high-grade osteosarcoma in children and young adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- MTHFR Polymorphism Is Associated With Severe Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity in Osteosarcoma Treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with or without ifosfamide in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2015Pooled it
- Does mifamurtide affect the elimination of high-dose methotrexate in children with osteosarcoma?Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Article
- Controversies and Challenges in the Management of Osteosarcoma-an Indian Perspective.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- Identification of Ferroptosis-Related Genes as Biomarkers for Sarcoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Ailanthone Inhibits Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Osteosarcoma Cells by Downregulating the Serine Biosynthetic Pathway.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Review and update on drugs related to the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2020Review
- Assessing the percent of necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 24hr infusional cisplatin/3 days Doxorubicin intermittent with Ifosfamide-Doxorubicin for osteosarcoma.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2014Article
- Incidence, clinical features and management of hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs in children with cancer.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Review
- Osteosarcoma: evolution of treatment paradigms.Sarcoma · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of the currently used treatment protocols for osteosarcoma are based on a combination of doxorubicin, cisplatin, methotrexate (MTX) and/or ifosfamide, of which MTX seems to be one of the most active drugs. However, in the literature, this has not been unambiguously proven.
objectivesTo compare the effectiveness of treatment including MTX with treatment without MTX for children and young adults (up to 21 years) with primary high-grade osteosarcoma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2010), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2011) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2011). In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings and ongoing trials databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing the effectiveness of treatment including MTX with treatment without MTX in the treatment of paediatric high-grade osteosarcoma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently performed the study selection. One reviewer performed the data extraction and quality assessment, which was checked by another reviewer. MAIN
resultsWe could not identify any studies in which the only difference between the treatment groups was the use of MTX.We did identify a RCT comparing MTX with cisplatin (n=30 children). The risk of bias in this study was difficult to assess due to a lack of reporting. Survival could not be evaluated, but no evidence of a significant difference in response rate between the treatment groups was identified (RR=0.44; 95% CI 0.17 to 1.13; P=0.09). A significant difference in the occurrence of toxicities in favour of MTX was identified, but with regard to quality of life treatment with cisplatin seemed to give better results.For other combinations of treatment including and not including MTX no studies were identified. AUTHORS'
conclusionsSince no RCTs or CCTs in which only the use of MTX differed between the treatment groups were identified, no definitive conclusions can be made about the effects on antitumour efficacy, toxicities and quality of life of the addition of MTX to treatment of children and young adults with primary high-grade osteosarcoma. The same is true for combinations of treatment including and not including MTX other than treatment with MTX versus treatment with cisplatin. Only 1 RCT comparing MTX with cisplatin treatment was available and therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of these agents in children and young adults with primary high-grade osteosarcoma. Furthermore, this study was performed in a different treatment era. Nowadays single agent treatment of osteosarcoma is considered inadequate. Based on the currently available evidence, we are not able to give recommendations for the use of MTX in clinical practice. More high quality research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.