ArticleBasic research in cardiology2011
Opposing effects of monomeric and pentameric C-reactive protein on endothelial progenitor cells.
Article in Basic research in cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The ZIF-8 nanoplatform targeted delivery of IFI44 siRNA to suppress bladder cancer development via modulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- C-reactive protein dissociation drives choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- UnravelingFrontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- C-Reactive Protein in Atherosclerosis-More than a Biomarker, but not Just a Culprit.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Emerging roles for human glycolipid transfer protein superfamily members in the regulation of autophagy, inflammation, and cell death.Progress in lipid research · 2020Review
- Insights of Chinese medicine on ventricular remodeling: Multiple-targets, individualized-treatment.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2017Review
- The Relationship Between High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Article
- Oxidized high-density lipoprotein impairs endothelial progenitor cells' function by activation of CD36-MAPK-TSP-1 pathways.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2015Article
- Influence of elevated levels of C-reactive protein on circulating endothelial progenitor cell function.Clinical and translational science · 2014Article
- A significant correlation between C - reactive protein levels in blood monocytes derived macrophages versus content in carotid atherosclerotic lesions.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2014Article
- C-Reactive Protein: An In-Depth Look into Structure, Function, and Regulation.International scholarly research notices · 2014Review
- Article
- Moutan Cortex Radicis inhibits inflammatory changes of gene expression in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated gingival fibroblasts.Journal of natural medicines · 2013Article
- Endothelial progenitor cells in cardiovascular disease and chronic inflammation: from biomarker to therapeutic agent.Biomarkers in medicine · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
C-reactive protein (CRP) has been linked to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The dissociation of native, pentameric (p)CRP to monomeric (m)CRP on the cell membrane of activated platelets has recently been demonstrated. The dissociation of pCRP to mCRP may explain local pro-inflammatory reactions at the site of developing atherosclerotic plaques. As a biomarker, pCRP predicts cardiovascular adverse events and so do reduced levels and function of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). We hypothesised that mCRP and pCRP exert a differential effect on EPC function and differentiation. EPCs were treated with mCRP or pCRP for 72 h, respectively. Phenotypical characterisation was done by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence microscopy, while the effect of mCRP and pCRP on gene expression was examined by whole-genome gene expression analysis. The functional capacity of EPCs was determined by colony forming unit (CFU) assay and endothelial tube formation assay. Double staining for acetylated LDL and ulex lectin significantly decreased in cells treated with pCRP. The length of tubuli in a matrigel assay with HUVECs decreased significantly in response to pCRP, but not to mCRP. The number of CFUs increased after pCRP treatment. RNA expression profiling demonstrated that mCRP and pCRP cause highly contradictory gene regulation. Interferon-responsive genes (IFI44L, IFI44, IFI27, IFI 6, MX1, OAS2) were among the highly up-regulated genes after mCRP, but not after pCRP treatment. In conclusion, EPC phenotype, genotype and function were differentially affected by mCRP and pCRP, strongly arguing for differential roles of these two CRP conformations. The up-regulation of interferon-inducible genes in response to mCRP may constitute a mechanism for the local regulation of EPC function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.