Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21562860›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2011

[Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia: anatomical features and technical pitfalls].

B M Holzapfel, D Bürklein, F Greimel, U Nöth, M Hoberg, H Gollwitzer, M Rudert

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

B M HolzapfelOrthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Brettreichstr. 11, 97074 Würzburg, Deutschland. holzapfel_b@chirurgie.uni-wuerzburg.de
D Bürklein
F Greimel
U Nöth
M Hoberg
H Gollwitzer
M Rudert
Klinik König-Ludwig Haus · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty is the procedure of choice for most patients with advanced, symptomatic osteoarthritis due to congenital dysplasia of the hip. However, the complexity of arthroplasty is significantly increased because of anatomic abnormalities associated with dysplasia of the hip. In addition the relatively young age of patients may affect survival of the implant. From a biomechanical standpoint the primary surgical objective is reconstruction of the anatomical center of rotation. Independent of the pelvic bone stock the socket should be located as near as possible to the anatomical acetabular location. There are various operative strategies to ascertain sufficient stability of the socket. The anterolateral deficiency of the acetabulum can be reconstructed by bulk femoral autografting or bone impaction grafting. Furthermore controlled perforation of the medial wall or implantation of reinforcement rings and oval sockets have been described. Cementless, biological socket fixation shows superior long-term results compared to cemented cups, especially in these young patients. The location of the reconstructed acetabulum and the desired leg length influence the type of femoral reconstruction and in some cases femoral shortening is required. In this article endoprosthetic reconstructive options for developmental dysplasia of the hip are discussed depending on the femoral and acetabular deformity.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip Dislocation, CongenitalHip ProsthesisHumans

Identifiers

PMID21562860
OpenAlexW1605710846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.