ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012
Blood component use and associated costs after standard dose chemotherapy--a prospective analysis of routine hospital care in lymphoproliferative disorders and NSCLC in Germany.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adverse effects observed in lung cancer patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy and effectiveness of supportive care drugs in a resource-limited setting.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to describe blood component (BC) use and respective cost after standard dose chemotherapy (CT) in routine hospital care.
methodsAnalysis of data from a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, observational study on lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing first or second line standard dose (immuno-)CT. Data were collected from patient interviews and pre-planned chart reviews. Costs of BC are presented from provider perspective.
resultsOne hundred eighty patients (n = 85 NSCLC, n = 95 LPD) receiving 189 CT lines/633 CT cycles) were evaluable (mean ± SD age, 59 ± 13.2 years, 68% stage III/IV, 14% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥ 2). During 11% of cycles, BC were transfused to 27% of patients (n = 49; n = 22 NSCLC, n = 27 LPD). Of 310 transfused units (TU), 68% were red blood cells (RBC). Mean number of TU per cycle with transfusion was 3.3 ± 2.9 (median = 2, range = 2-17) for RBC, 4.8 ± 6.8 (median = 2, range = 1-23) for platelets (PLT) and 12.8 ± 14.6 (median = 8, range = 2-33) for fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Fifteen per cent of RBC units, 60% of PLT units and 92% of FFP in this study were transfused in cycles with sepsis. Mean BC cost per CT line were euro 602 ± 1,458 (median = 135, range = 135-9,385; NSCLC: euro 292 ± 376, median = 135, range = 135-2,124; LPD: euro 1,010 ± 2,137, median = 212, range = 135-9,385, p = 0.2137). For 55% of transfused RBC units, haemoglobin levels on the day of transfusion were 8.0-8.9 g/dl, for 38% <8 g/dl and for 7% ≥ 9 g/dl. Seventy-five per cent of PLT units were transfused at a PLT count <11,000/μl and 21% at 20,000-11,000/μl.
conclusionsThe results reflect the diversity of BC use after standard dose CT. High transfusion need is associated with infectious complications, i.e. sepsis emphasising the need for adequate prophylaxis and further knowledge of baseline risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21562801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.