Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21562726›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2012

Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance and dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-risk chest pain.

Gregory Hartlage, Matthew Janik, Athanasios Anadiotis, Emir Veledar, John Oshinski, Dimitrios Kremastinos, Arthur Stillman, Stamatios Lerakis

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2012
    Trial
  3. Long-Term Prognostic Value of Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  4. Coronary calcification compromises myocardial perfusion irrespective of luminal stenosis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory HartlageDepartment of Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. GHartla@emory.edu
Matthew Janik
Athanasios Anadiotis
Emir Veledar
John Oshinski
Dimitrios Kremastinos
Arthur Stillman
Stamatios Lerakis
Emory University · USUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excluding obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as the etiology of acute chest pain in patients without diagnostic electrocardiographic changes or elevated serum cardiac biomarkers is challenging. Stress testing is a valuable risk-stratifying technique reserved for the subset of these patients with low-risk chest pain who have an intermediate clinical probability of obstructive CAD. Given the risks of radiation inherent to nuclear and computed tomography imaging, both adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (AS-CMR) imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) are attractive alternative stress modalities. An essential characteristic of stress modalities is their negative prognostic value; as one must exclude clinically-relevant CAD such that patients can be discharged safely. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate a favorable negative prognostic value for both AS-CMR and DSE in patients presenting with low-risk acute chest pain. This retrospective study included 255 patients with low-risk acute chest pain and no prior history of CAD presenting to the emergency department at our institution, with 89 patients evaluated by AS-CMR and 166 by DSE. Median follow-up was 292 days, and consisted of medical record review. The primary end-point was the composite of cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or recurrent chest pain requiring hospital admission. Test characteristics such as sensitivity and specificity could not be evaluated as patients were not routinely evaluated with ICA. All patients completed the stress protocol without adverse events during testing. 82/89 patients (92.1%) and 164/166 patients (98.8%) had negative AS-CMR and DSE studies, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE had excellent negative prognostic values for the primary endpoint, 100 and 99%, respectively. Both AS-CMR and DSE are effective stress modalities for excluding clinically significant coronary artery disease in patients presenting acute low-risk chest pain. Patients without findings to suggest ischemia have an excellent intermediate-term prognosis.

Indexed as

AdenosineDobutamineEchocardiography, StressExercise TestMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAngina PectorisChi-Square DistributionCoronary Artery DiseaseEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGeorgiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedAdenosineDobutamine

Identifiers

PMID21562726
OpenAlexW2082519544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.