Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21562194›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Contribution of motoneuron intrinsic properties to fictive motor pattern generation.

Terrence M Wright, Ronald L Calabrese

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The neural control of heartbeat in invertebrates.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Small is beautiful: models of small neuronal networks.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2012
    Review
  9. The activity of leech motoneurons during motor patterns is regulated by intrinsic properties and synaptic inputs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Patterns of presynaptic activity and synaptic strength interact to produce motor output.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Terrence M WrightDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. terrence.m.wright@gmail.com
Ronald L Calabrese
Emory University · US

Funding

NEUROMODULATORY INFLUENCES ON MOTOR SYSTEMSR01NS024072 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CALABRESE, RONALD L · 1985 to 2011
$3.6M
Quality of Care and Outcomes for Depressed AdolescentsK23MH001882 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MED SCIS LTL ROCK · PI KRAMER, TERESA L · 2001 to 2005
$804k
Neuromodulatory Influences on Motor SystemsR56NS024072 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CALABRESE, RONALD L · 2013 to 2013
$386k
NIMH NIH HHS 5 T06 MH-1882NINDS NIH HHS NS-24072NINDS NIH HHS NS-8472431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, we reported a canonical ensemble model of the heart motoneurons that underlie heartbeat in the medicinal leech. The model motoneurons contained a minimal set of electrical intrinsic properties and received a synaptic input pattern based on measurements performed in the living system. Although the model captured the synchronous and peristaltic motor patterns observed in the living system, it did not match quantitatively the motor output observed. Because the model motoneurons had minimal intrinsic electrical properties, the mismatch between model and living system suggests a role for additional intrinsic properties in generating the motor pattern. We used the dynamic clamp to test this hypothesis. We introduced the same segmental input pattern used in the model to motoneurons isolated pharmacologically from their endogenous input in the living system. We show that, although the segmental input pattern determines the segmental phasing differences observed in motoneurons, the intrinsic properties of the motoneurons play an important role in determining their phasing, particularly when receiving the synchronous input pattern. We then used trapezoidal input waveforms to show that the intrinsic properties present in the living system promote phase advances compared with our model motoneurons. Electrical coupling between heart motoneurons also plays a role in shaping motoneuron output by synchronizing the activity of the motoneurons within a segment. These experiments provide a direct assessment of how motoneuron intrinsic properties interact with their premotor pattern of synaptic drive to produce rhythmic output.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsHeartInterneuronsLeechesMotor NeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID21562194
PMCPMC3154826
OpenAlexW2013294671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.