Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21562192›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Regulation of Nav1.6 and Nav1.8 peripheral nerve Na+ channels by auxiliary β-subunits.

Juan Zhao, Michael E O'Leary, Mohamed Chahine

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Excelsatoxin A-Receptor TMEM233 Modulates Nav1.8.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Structural basis of inhibition of human NaNature communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural basis of inhibition of human NabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Structure of human NaNature communications · 2023
    Article
  9. Cryo-EM structure of human voltage-gated sodium channel NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Resurgent NaNature communications · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Loss-of-function of Nav1.8/D1639N linked to human pain can be rescued by lidocaine.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Effects of 4,9-anhydrotetrodotoxin on voltage-gated NaNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Roles of NaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan ZhaoCentre de Recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard, 2601 Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Michael E O'Leary
Mohamed Chahine

Funding

Electrophysiology of peripheral nerve sodium channelsR01GM078244 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI O'LEARY, MICHAEL E · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
CIHR INO-77909NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078244NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM-078244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage-gated Na(+) (Na(v)) channels are composed of a pore-forming α-subunit and one or more auxiliary β-subunits. The present study investigated the regulation by the β-subunit of two Na(+) channels (Na(v)1.6 and Na(v)1.8) expressed in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Single cell RT-PCR was used to show that Na(v)1.8, Na(v)1.6, and β(1)-β(3) subunits were widely expressed in individually harvested small-diameter DRG neurons. Coexpression experiments were used to assess the regulation of Na(v)1.6 and Na(v)1.8 by β-subunits. The β(1)-subunit induced a 2.3-fold increase in Na(+) current density and hyperpolarizing shifts in the activation (-4 mV) and steady-state inactivation (-4.7 mV) of heterologously expressed Na(v)1.8 channels. The β(4)-subunit caused more pronounced shifts in activation (-16.7 mV) and inactivation (-9.3 mV) but did not alter the current density of cells expressing Na(v)1.8 channels. The β(3)-subunit did not alter Na(v)1.8 gating but significantly reduced the current density by 31%. This contrasted with Na(v)1.6, where the β-subunits were relatively weak regulators of channel function. One notable exception was the β(4)-subunit, which induced a hyperpolarizing shift in activation (-7.6 mV) but no change in the inactivation or current density of Na(v)1.6. The β-subunits differentially regulated the expression and gating of Na(v)1.8 and Na(v)1.6. To further investigate the underlying regulatory mechanism, β-subunit chimeras containing portions of the strongly regulating β(1)-subunit and the weakly regulating β(2)-subunit were generated. Chimeras retaining the COOH-terminal domain of the β(1)-subunit produced hyperpolarizing shifts in gating and increased the current density of Na(v)1.8, similar to that observed for wild-type β(1)-subunits. The intracellular COOH-terminal domain of the β(1)-subunit appeared to play an essential role in the regulation of Na(v)1.8 expression and gating.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornGanglia, SpinalGene Expression RegulationHEK293 CellsHumansIon Channel GatingNAV1.6 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurons, AfferentPeripheral NervesProtein SubunitsRatsSodium ChannelsNAV1.6 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNerve Tissue ProteinsProtein SubunitsSCN10A protein, humanScn10a protein, ratSCN8A protein, humanSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID21562192
PMCPMC3296273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.