ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2011
Recent drug history in children visiting a pediatric emergency room and documentation in medical records.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe performed a systematic analysis of which drugs, prescribed, over the counter (OTC), and/or natural remedies, children had used prior to visiting a pediatric emergency room (ER), and to compare this information with the documentation of drug use in the medical records.
methodsA questionnaire study was performed at a pediatric ER in a Swedish university hospital during 3 weeks in April 2008. The questionnaire was validated through an interview with a subgroup of participants. Only drug use associated with the time of that hospital visit was requested. Information was compared with information in medical records related to the same visit.
resultsTwo hundred and seventy-four children aged 0-18 (median 2) years were enrolled, representing 28% of the total number of patients visiting the ER within the time frame. Forty% (n = 109) of participants reported use of prescribed drugs, 65% (n = 172) OTC drugs, and 8% (n = 17) natural remedies prior to the ER visit. The most common drugs in the three groups were salbutamol, paracetamol, and omega fatty acids, respectively. In the medical records, no more than 50% of the reported drug intake could be found, representing 74% of prescribed drugs but only 34% of OTC drugs and 27% of natural remedies.
conclusionsThe majority of children had used drugs, both prescribed and OTC, before coming to the ER , but this drug intake, and especially that of nonprescribed drugs, was often not documented in the medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.