Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21559803›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2011

Alcohol impairs brain reactivity to explicit loss feedback.

Lindsay D Nelson, Christopher J Patrick, Paul Collins, Alan R Lang, Edward M Bernat

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk-Taking Is Associated with Decreased Subjective Value Signals and Increased Prediction Error Signals in the Hot Columbia Card Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lindsay D NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, 1107 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA. nelson@psy.fsu.edu
Christopher J Patrick
Paul Collins
Alan R Lang
Edward M Bernat

Funding

Project 6: Individual Differences in the Motivational Substrates (pg 275)P50MH072850 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PRINCIPE, JOSE CARLOS · 2005 to 2009
$8.8M
PROBING AFFECTIVE AND COGNITIVE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOLR01AA012164 · NIAAA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LANG, ALAN R. · 2000 to 2004
$1.1M
Psychometric and Neurobiological Mechanisms of Impulse Control DisordersF31MH088143 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NELSON, LINDSAY · 2010 to 2010
$34k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA12164NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012164NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH088143NIMH NIH HHS MH072850NIMH NIH HHS MH088143NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH072850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAlcohol impairs the brain's detection of performance errors as evidenced by attenuated error-related negativity (ERN), an event-related potential (ERP) thought to reflect a brain system that monitors one's behavior. However, it remains unclear whether alcohol impairs performance-monitoring capacity across a broader range of contexts, including those entailing external feedback.

objectiveThis study sought to determine whether alcohol-related monitoring deficits are specific to internal recognition of errors (reflected by the ERN) or occur also in external cuing contexts. We evaluated the impact of alcohol consumption on the feedback-related negativity (FRN), an ERP thought to engage a similar process as the ERN but elicited by negative performance feedback in the environment.

methodsIn an undergraduate sample randomly assigned to drink alcohol (n = 37; average peak BAC = 0.087 g/100 ml, estimated from breath alcohol sampling) or placebo beverages (n = 42), ERP responses to gain and loss feedback were measured during a two-choice gambling task. Time-frequency analysis was used to parse the overlapping theta-FRN and delta-P3 and clarified the effects of alcohol on the measures.

resultsAlcohol intoxication attenuated both the theta-FRN and delta-P3 brain responses to feedback. The theta-FRN attenuation was stronger following loss than gain feedback.

conclusionsAttenuation of both theta-FRN and delta-P3 components indicates that alcohol pervasively attenuates the brain's response to feedback in this task. That theta-FRN attenuation was stronger following loss trials is consistent with prior ERN findings and suggests that alcohol broadly impairs the brain's recognition of negative performance outcomes across differing contexts.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlcoholic IntoxicationBreath TestsEthanolEvoked PotentialsFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleGamblingHumansMaleYoung AdultEthanol

Identifiers

PMID21559803
PMCPMC6589838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.