Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21559496›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Anti-bacterial effects of poly-N-acetyl-glucosamine nanofibers in cutaneous wound healing: requirement for Akt1.

Haley Buff Lindner, Aiguo Zhang, Juanita Eldridge, Marina Demcheva, Philip Tsichlis, Philip Tsichilis, Arun Seth, John Vournakis, Robin C Muise-Helmericks

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Study on the Mechanism ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Tsichilis, Philip [corrected to Tsichlis, Philip]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Haley Buff LindnerDepartment of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Aiguo Zhang
Juanita Eldridge
Marina Demcheva
Philip Tsichlis
Philip Tsichilis
Arun Seth
John Vournakis
Robin C Muise-Helmericks
Medical University of South Carolina · USMarine Polymer Technologies (United States) · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CATufts University · US

Funding

T-COHR: Training in Craniofacial and Oral Health ResearchT32DE017551 · NIDCR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI YAO, HAI · 2006 to 2025
$10.3M
A novel VEGF signaling pathway leading to mitochondrial biogenesisR01HL084565 · NHLBI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MUISE-HELMERICKS, ROBIN C · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
pGlcNAc stimulates wound healing and defensin expression via AKT1F30DE021612 · NIDCR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BUFF LINDNER, AMANDA HALEY · 2011 to 2014
$187k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084565NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL084565-02NIDCR NIH HHS 5T32DE017551NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE021612NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE017551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of cutaneous wounds with poly-N-acetyl-glucosamine nanofibers (sNAG) results in increased kinetics of wound closure in diabetic animal models, which is due in part to increased expression of several cytokines, growth factors, and innate immune activation. Defensins are also important for wound healing and anti-microbial activities. Therefore, we tested whether sNAG nanofibers induce defensin expression resulting in bacterial clearance. METHODOLOGY: The role of sNAG in defensin expression was examined using immunofluoresence microscopy, pharmacological inhibition, and shRNA knockdown in vitro. The ability of sNAG treatment to induce defensin expression and bacterial clearance in WT and AKT1-/- mice was carried out using immunofluoresent microscopy and tissue gram staining. Neutralization, using an antibody directed against β-defensin 3, was utilized to determine if the antimicrobial properties of sNAG are dependent on the induction of defensin expression. CONCLUSIONS/

findingssNAG treatment causes increased expression of both α- and β-type defensins in endothelial cells and β-type defensins in keratinocytes. Pharmacological inhibition and shRNA knockdown implicates Akt1 in sNAG-dependent defensin expression in vitro, an activity also shown in an in vivo wound healing model. Importantly, sNAG treatment results in increased kinetics of wound closure in wild type animals. sNAG treatment decreases bacterial infection of cutaneous wounds infected with Staphylococcus aureus in wild type control animals but not in similarly treated Akt1 null animals. Furthermore, sNAG treatment of S. aureus infected wounds show an increased expression of β-defensin 3 which is required for sNAG-dependent bacterial clearance. Our findings suggest that Akt1 is involved in the regulation of defensin expression and the innate immune response important for bacterial clearance. Moreover, these findings support the use of sNAG nanofibers as a novel method for enhancing wound closure while simultaneously decreasing wound infection.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAcetylglucosamineAnimalsAnti-Infective Agentsbeta-DefensinsCytokinesEndothelial CellsKeratinocytesKineticsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, FluorescenceNanofibersProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAcetylglucosamineAnti-Infective Agentsbeta-DefensinsCytokinespoly-N-acetyl glucosamineProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID21559496
PMCPMC3084735
OpenAlexW2021401056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.