ArticlePloS one2011
Isolation and culture of larval cells from C. elegans.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-type neuron transcriptomics uncovers cell-type-specific regulators of host defense inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- A gene expression atlas of a juvenile nervous system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Knockdown of mitochondrial sirtuin sir-2.2 reduces alpha-synuclein clearance and impairs energy homeostasis in a model of ageing.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Article
- Evolution of developmental bias explains divergent patterns of phenotypic evolution in two nematode clades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Decoding sexual dimorphism of the sex-shared nervous system at single-neuron resolution.Science advances · 2025Article
- Argonaute CSR-1A promotes H3K9me3 maintenance to protect somatic development in offspring.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Bio-orthogonal Glycan Imaging of Cultured Cells and Whole AnimalACS central science · 2025Article
- Detecting gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics · 2025Review
- An E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme links diubiquitinated H2B to H3K27M oncohistone function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Vacuolar HeLife · 2024Article
- MAB-5/Hox regulates the Q neuroblast transcriptome, including cwn-1/Wnt, to mediate posterior migration in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics · 2024Article
- Functional implications of NHR-210 enrichment in C. elegans cephalic sheath glia: insights into metabolic and mitochondrial disruptions in Parkinson's disease models.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Article
- MAB-5/Hox regulates the Q neuroblast transcriptome, includingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Prolonging somatic cell proliferation through constitutive hox gene expression in C. elegans.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Body stiffness is a mechanical property that facilitates contact-mediated mate recognition in Caenorhabditis elegans.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- The diverse family of Cys-loop receptors inBiophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Whole-body gene expression atlas of an adult metazoan.Science advances · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell culture is an essential tool to study cell function. In C. elegans the ability to isolate and culture cells has been limited to embryonically derived cells. However, cells or blastomeres isolated from mixed stage embryos terminally differentiate within 24 hours of culture, thus precluding post-embryonic stage cell culture. We have developed an efficient and technically simple method for large-scale isolation and primary culture of larval-stage cells. We have optimized the treatment to maximize cell number and minimize cell death for each of the four larval stages. We obtained up to 7.8×10(4) cells per microliter of packed larvae, and up to 97% of adherent cells isolated by this method were viable for at least 16 hours. Cultured larval cells showed stage-specific increases in both cell size and multinuclearity and expressed lineage- and cell type-specific reporters. The majority (81%) of larval cells isolated by our method were muscle cells that exhibited stage-specific phenotypes. L1 muscle cells developed 1 to 2 wide cytoplasmic processes, while L4 muscle cells developed 4 to 14 processes of various thicknesses. L4 muscle cells developed bands of myosin heavy chain A thick filaments at the cell center and spontaneously contracted ex vivo. Neurons constituted less than 10% of the isolated cells and the majority of neurons developed one or more long, microtubule-rich protrusions that terminated in actin-rich growth cones. In addition to cells such as muscle and neuron that are high abundance in vivo, we were also able to isolate M-lineage cells that constitute less than 0.2% of cells in vivo. Our novel method of cell isolation extends C. elegans cell culture to larval developmental stages, and allows use of the wealth of cell culture tools, such as cell sorting, electrophysiology, co-culture, and high-resolution imaging of subcellular dynamics, in investigation of post-embryonic development and physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.