Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21559248›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2011

Safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib in combination with panitumumab and gemcitabine-Cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

Howard Burris, Joe Stephenson, Gregory A Otterson, Mark Stein, Jesse McGreivy, Yu-Nien Sun, Megan Ingram, Yining Ye, Lee S Schwartzberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00101907 (An Open-Label, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety of AMG 706 Plus Panitumumab Plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00101907 phase1terminatednot on this map

An Open-Label, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety of AMG 706 Plus Panitumumab Plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2004 to 2008Enrolled41ConditionsLung Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Esophageal CancerArmsAMG 706, Panitumumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Howard BurrisSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Joe Stephenson
Gregory A Otterson
Mark Stein
Jesse McGreivy
Yu-Nien Sun
Megan Ingram
Yining Ye
Lee S Schwartzberg
Amgen (United States) · USCampbell Clinic · USRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital · USSarah Cannon · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of motesanib (an orally administered small-molecule antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit) when administered in combination with panitumumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Methods. This was an open-label, multicenter phase 1b study in patients with advanced solid tumors with an ECOG performance status ≤1 and for whom a gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen was indicated. Patients received motesanib (0 mg [control], 50 mg once daily [QD], 75 mg QD, 100 mg QD, 125 mg QD, or 75 mg twice daily [BID]) with panitumumab (9 mg/kg), gemcitabine (1250 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Results. Forty-one patients were enrolled and received treatment (including 8 control patients). One of eight patients in the 50 mg QD cohort and 5/11 patients in the 125 mg QD cohort experienced DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose was established as 100 mg QD. Among patients who received motesanib (n = 33), 29 had motesanib-related adverse events. Fourteen patients had serious motesanib-related events. Ten patients had motesanib-related venous thromboembolic events and three had motesanib-related arterial thromboembolic events, two of which were considered serious. One patient had a complete response and nine had partial responses as their best objective response. Conclusions. The combination of motesanib, panitumumab, and gemcitabine/cisplatin could not be administered consistently and, at the described doses and schedule, may be intolerable. However, encouraging antitumor activity was noted in some cases.

Identifiers

PMID21559248
PMCPMC3087488
OpenAlexW2073549440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.