ArticleSelf/nonself2010
On the issue of peptide recognition in T cell development.
Article in Self/nonself, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinetic proofreading and the search for nonself-peptides.Self/nonself · 2011Article
- Self/nonself perception, reproduction and the extended MHC.Self/nonself · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD4-CD8 double positive (DP) thymocytes undergo a differentiation process in the thymus where they are selected based on their ability to recognize peptide antigens presented on self major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The first stage of this process is positive selection, a quality-control mechanism which ensures that the T cell receptors (TCR) presented on developing thymocytes can transmit signals via peptides presented on either MHC class I (MHC1) or MHC class II (MHC2) molecules. Work over the past decade has revealed that the peptides that drive positive selection of both CD4 and CD8 lineage cells deliver only weak TCR signals. In line with these observations, specialized protein degradation machineries have been discovered in the thymic cortex that presumably generate specialized low-affinity peptide repertoires for presentation on MHC1 and MHC2 molecules. TCR signals transduced through these weak-affinity ligands in the early stages of positive selection alter the kinetics of expression of CD4 and CD8 molecules and play a crucial role in commitment of thymocytes to either the CD4 or CD8 lineages. In this work, we review the experiments that explore the peptide repertoires that are presented to developing thymocytes during positive selection, the observed signaling patterns that lead to CD4 versus CD8 lineage commitment, and speculate about how specialized organization of the signaling machinery in DP thymocytes may allow for efficient transduction of weak signals during the course of positive selection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.