Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21559034›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2011

Supporting postpartum weight loss in women living in deprived communities: design implications for a randomised control trial.

A M Craigie, M Macleod, K L Barton, S Treweek, A S Anderson, WeighWell team

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Diet or exercise, or both, for weight reduction in women after childbirth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Dietary outcomes of a community based intervention for mothers of young children: a randomised controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2014
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A M CraigieCentre for Public Health Nutrition Research, Division of Clinical and Population Sciences and Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
M Macleod
K L Barton
S Treweek
A S Anderson
WeighWell team

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701771Medical Research Council G0701771(85338)Medical Research Council GO701771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPregnancy is a life stage where excess weight gain may occur and the postpartum period is often characterised by weight retention. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a randomised controlled trial of a weight loss intervention (WeighWell) in postpartum women living in areas of social disadvantage. SUBJECTS/

methodsThe study aimed to recruit 60 women who were not pregnant, 6-18 months postpartum with a body mass index >25 kg/m(2) living in areas of deprivation within Tayside, UK. Recruitment strategies focused on visits to community groups; writing directly to postpartum women living in areas of deprivation and primary care teams who covered the most deprived 15% of the population and advertising in community settings. The 12-week intervention used motivational interviewing techniques to promote an energy deficit diet and increased physical activity, delivered by three face-to-face consultations plus three structured telephone calls.

resultsOf 142 women screened, 63 were eligible and 52 (83%) were recruited and randomised to an intervention (n=29) or comparison group (n=23). Over the 12-week intervention, body weight changed significantly by -1.6 ± 2.0 kg in the intervention group compared with +0.2 ± 2.2 kg in the comparison group, indicating the potential efficacy of the intervention. Loss to follow-up was 24% in the intervention group and 39% for the comparison group.

conclusionsThe findings support the development of a definitive trial that embraces personalised recruitment strategies and the development of approaches to improve retention over a clinically relevant intervention period.

Indexed as

Body WeightPostpartum PeriodWeight LossAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCounselingDietFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterviews as TopicPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight Reduction Programs

Identifiers

PMID21559034
PMCPMC3154650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.