Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21559019›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011

Prognostic utility of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index in early-stage breast cancer patients from the Stockholm trial.

P-L Jerevall, X-J Ma, H Li, R Salunga, N C Kesty, M G Erlander, D C Sgroi, B Holmlund, L Skoog, T Fornander and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Twenty-Year Benefit From Adjuvant Goserelin and Tamoxifen in Premenopausal Patients With Breast Cancer in a Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Omics Technologies Improving Breast Cancer Research and Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

P-L JerevallDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, SE58185, Sweden. piiha-lotta.jerevall@liu.se
X-J Ma
H Li
R Salunga
N C Kesty
M G Erlander
D C Sgroi
B Holmlund
L Skoog
T Fornander
B Nordenskjöld
O Stål
Theranostics (New Zealand) · NZLinköping University · SEBoston University · USKarolinska University Hospital · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

A NOVEL BREAST CANCER BIOMARKERR01CA112021 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SGROI, DENNIS C · 2005 to 2013
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA dichotomous index combining two gene expression assays, HOXB13:IL17BR (H:I) and molecular grade index (MGI), was developed to assess risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients. The study objective was to demonstrate the prognostic utility of the combined index in early-stage breast cancer.

methodsIn a blinded retrospective analysis of 588 ER-positive tamoxifen-treated and untreated breast cancer patients from the randomised prospective Stockholm trial, H:I and MGI were measured using real-time RT-PCR. Association with patient outcome was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression. A continuous risk index was developed using Cox modelling.

resultsThe dichotomous H:I+MGI was significantly associated with distant recurrence and breast cancer death. The >50% of tamoxifen-treated patients categorised as low-risk had <3% 10-year distant recurrence risk. A continuous risk model (Breast Cancer Index (BCI)) was developed with the tamoxifen-treated group and the prognostic performance tested in the untreated group was 53% of patients categorised as low risk with an 8.3% 10-year distant recurrence risk.

conclusionRetrospective analysis of this randomised, prospective trial cohort validated the prognostic utility of H:I+MGI and was used to develop and test a continuous risk model that enables prediction of distant recurrence risk at the patient level.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHomeodomain ProteinsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentPostmenopausePrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, InterleukinReceptors, Interleukin-17Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk AssessmentSwedenBiomarkers, TumorHomeodomain ProteinsHOXB13 protein, humanIL17RB protein, humanReceptors, InterleukinReceptors, Interleukin-17Tamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID21559019
PMCPMC3111159
OpenAlexW2122283445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.