Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21558767›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2011

Epidemiological model for Clostridium difficile transmission in healthcare settings.

C Lanzas, E R Dubberke, Z Lu, K A Reske, Y T Gröhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Open forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C LanzasDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. clanzas@utk.edu
E R Dubberke
Z Lu
K A Reske
Y T Gröhn

Funding

Wsahington Univ & BJC Epi-Center for Prevention of Healthcare-Associated InfectioU01CI000333 · CI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, VICTORIA J. · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
VALIDATION AND MODELING OF A C. DIFFICILE INFECTION RISK PREDICTION INDEXR21NR011362 · NINR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUBBERKE, ERIK R · 2009 to 2010
$416k
C. DIFFICILE DISEASE IN STEM CELL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTSK23AI065806 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUBBERKE, ERIK R · 2009 to 2011
$374k
FOOD &WATERBORNE DISEASES INTEGRATED RESEARCH NETWORK, ZOONOES RESEAR-N01AI030054 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · 2003 to 2003
–
NCPDCID CDC HHS 5 U01 CI000333-04NCPDCID CDC HHS U01 CI000333NIAID NIH HHS 1K23AI065806-01A2NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI065806NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI062141NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030054NINR NIH HHS 1 R21 NR011362-01NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent outbreaks of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have been difficult to control, and data indicate that the importance of different sources of transmission may have changed. Our objectives were to evaluate the contributions of asymptomatic and symptomatic C. difficile carriers to new colonizations and to determine the most important epidemiological factors influencing C. difficile transmission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to medical wards at a large tertiary care hospital in the United States in the calendar year 2008.

methodsData from six medical wards and published literature were used to develop a compartmental model of C. difficile transmission. Patients could be in one of five transition states in the model: resistant to colonization (R), susceptible to colonization (S), asymptomatically colonized without protection against CDI (C(-)), asymptomatically colonized with protection against CDI (C(+)), and diseased (ie, with CDI; D).

resultsThe contributions of C(-), C(+), and D patients to new colonizations were similar. The simulated basic reproduction number ranged from 0.55 to 1.99, with a median of 1.04. These values suggest that transmission within the ward alone from patients with CDI cannot sustain new C. difficile colonizations and therefore that the admission of colonized patients plays an important role in sustaining transmission in the ward. The epidemiological parameters that ranked as the most influential were the proportion of admitted C(-) patients and the transmission coefficient for asymptomatic carriers.

conclusionOur study underscores the need to further evaluate the role of asymptomatically colonized patients in C. difficile transmission in healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileEpidemiologic MethodsHospitalsCarrier StateClostridium InfectionsCross InfectionHumansModels, StatisticalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21558767
PMCPMC3645005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.