Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21558022›Full record

ReviewRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2011

Activities of human genioglossus motor units.

E Fiona Bailey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Kölliker-Fuse nucleus: a review of animal studies and the implications for cranial nerve function in humans.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Activation of upper airway muscles during breathing and swallowing.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pulmonary C-fiber activation attenuates respiratory-related tongue movements.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E Fiona BaileyDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0093, USA. ebailey@u.arizona.edu
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Neuromuscular control of the human tongueR01DC009587 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BAILEY, E. FIONA · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper airway muscles play an important role in regulating airway lumen and in increasing the ability of the pharynx to remain patent in the face of subatmospheric intraluminal pressures produced during inspiration. Due to the considerable technical challenges associated with recording from muscles of the upper airway, much of the experimental work conducted in human subjects has centered on recording respiratory-related activities of the extrinsic tongue protudor muscle, the genioglossus (GG). The GG is one of eight muscles that invest the human tongue (Abd-El-Malek, 1939). All eight muscles are innervated by the hypoglossal nerve (cranial nerve XII) the cell bodies of which are located in the hypoglossal motor nucleus (HMN) of the caudal medulla. Much of the earlier work on the respiratory-related activity of XII motoneurons was based on recordings obtained from single motor axons dissected from the whole XII nerve or from whole muscle GG EMG recordings. Detailed information regarding respiratory-related GG motor unit activities was lacking until as recently as 2006. This paper examines key findings that have emerged from the last decade of work conducted in human subjects. Wherever appropriate, these results are compared with results obtained from in vitro and in vivo studies conducted in non-human mammals. The review is written with the objective of facilitating some discussion and some new thoughts regarding future research directions. The material is framed around four topics: (a) motor unit type, (b) rate coding and recruitment, (c) motor unit activity patterns, and (d) a compartment based view of pharyngeal airway control.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsHumansHypoglossal NervePharyngeal MusclesRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalTongue

Identifiers

PMID21558022
PMCPMC3175270
OpenAlexW2009659502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.