Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21556954›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2011

Comparative analysis of the N-genome in diploid and polyploid Aegilops species.

Ekaterina D Badaeva, Olga S Dedkova, Svyatoslav A Zoshchuk, Alexandra V Amosova, Stephen M Reader, Michel Bernard, Alexander V Zelenin

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chromosome-specific painting in Thinopyrum species using bulked oligonucleotides.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  2. Intraspecific divergence of diploid grassComparative cytogenetics · 2023
    Article
  3. Production and characterization of a disomic 1M/1DMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of Structural Genomic Diversity inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ekaterina D BadaevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991, Russia. katerinabadaeva@gmail.com
Olga S Dedkova
Svyatoslav A Zoshchuk
Alexandra V Amosova
Stephen M Reader
Michel Bernard
Alexander V Zelenin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic classification for the N-genome chromosomes has been developed on the basis of C-banding analysis on the set of Triticum aestivum × Aegilops uniaristata single chromosome addition lines and examination of A. uniaristata (2n = 2 × = 14, NN), Aegilops ventricosa (2n = 4 × = 28, DDNN) and Aegilops recta (2n = 6 × = 42, UUX(n)X(n)NN) accessions carrying intergenomic translocations using fluorescence in situ hybridisation with probes for three repetitive DNA sequences as well as the 5S and 45S rDNA families. The N-genome chromosomes of the tetraploid A. ventricosa show significant changes relative to the diploid progenitor species, while those of the hexaploid A. recta are similar to A. uniaristata with regard to the distribution of C-bands, 45S and 5S rDNA loci and hybridisation sites of all the three families of tandem repeats. The possible mechanisms of N-genome evolution are discussed.

Indexed as

DiploidyPolyploidyChromosome BandingChromosomes, PlantDNA, RibosomalGenome, PlantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingPoaceaeTandem Repeat SequencesDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.