Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2155688›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology1990

The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers.

G I Barrow, P G Higgins, W al-Nakib, A P Smith, R B Wenham, D A Tyrrell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effect of inhaled and intranasal sodium cromoglycate on symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 1996
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Reinfection With SARS-CoV-2: Implications for Vaccines.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Treatment of the common cold.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1998
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Cromolyns: treatment for the common cold.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 1996
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The common cold: current therapy and natural history.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 1995
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G I BarrowMRC Common Cold Unit, Harvard Hospital, Salisbury, U.K.
P G Higgins
W al-Nakib
A P Smith
R B Wenham
D A Tyrrell
University of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two studies involving double-blind group comparative trials in human volunteers compared the effects of intranasal nedocromil sodium (2.6 mg active drug per nostril, q.i.d.) with placebo on clinical symptoms and performance impairment associated with the common cold. In the first study volunteers were challenged with rhinoviruses (RV9 and RV14), and in the second study with respiratory coronavirus. In both studies, active and placebo groups of volunteers were demographically similar. Infection rates in both groups were also similar. There were no withdrawals resulting from unusual symptoms related to either treatment. In the rhinovirus study (19, placebo; 20, nedocromil sodium) daily symptom scores and daily mean nasal secretion weights were significantly lower in the nedocromil sodium-treated group. In the coronavirus study (26, placebo; 27, nedocromil sodium) there was little difference in the severity of colds between the active and placebo-treated groups, but trends favoured nedocromil sodium. In both studies the impairment of performance in volunteers who developed a cold was significantly less in those treated with nedocromil sodium than in those treated with placebo.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultCommon ColdCoronaviridae InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNedocromilPicornaviridae InfectionsQuinolonesRandom AllocationRhinovirusNedocromilQuinolones

Identifiers

PMID2155688
PMCPMC7185334
OpenAlexW2123982907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.