Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21556366›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

Predictive and prognostic impact of TP53 mutations and MDM2 promoter genotype in primary breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin or paclitaxel.

Ranjan Chrisanthar, Stian Knappskog, Erik Løkkevik, Gun Anker, Bjørn Ostenstad, Steinar Lundgren, Terje Risberg, Ingvil Mjaaland, Gudbrand Skjønsberg, Turid Aas and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. TP53 mutations and MDM2 polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancers: amelioration by drugs and natural compounds.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic Influences in Breast Cancer Drug Resistance.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ranjan ChrisantharSection of Oncology, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Stian Knappskog
Erik Løkkevik
Gun Anker
Bjørn Ostenstad
Steinar Lundgren
Terje Risberg
Ingvil Mjaaland
Gudbrand Skjønsberg
Turid Aas
Ellen Schlichting
Hans E Fjösne
Arne Nysted
Johan Richard Lillehaug
Per Eystein Lønning
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOStavanger University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTP53 mutations have been associated with resistance to anthracyclines but not to taxanes in breast cancer patients. The MDM2 promoter single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) T309G increases MDM2 activity and may reduce wild-type p53 protein activity. Here, we explored the predictive and prognostic value of TP53 and CHEK2 mutation status together with MDM2 SNP309 genotype in stage III breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel or epirubicin monotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL

designEach patient was randomly assigned to treatment with epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) (n = 109) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (n = 114) every 3rd week as monotherapy for 4-6 cycles. Patients obtaining a suboptimal response on first-line treatment requiring further chemotherapy received the opposite regimen. Time from last patient inclusion to follow-up censoring was 69 months. Each patient had snap-frozen tumor tissue specimens collected prior to commencing chemotherapy. PRINCIPAL

findingsWhile TP53 and CHEK2 mutations predicted resistance to epirubicin, MDM2 status did not. Neither TP53/CHEK2 mutations nor MDM2 status was associated with paclitaxel response. Remarkably, TP53 mutations (p = 0.007) but also MDM2 309TG/GG genotype status (p = 0.012) were associated with a poor disease-specific survival among patients having paclitaxel but not patients having epirubicin first-line. The effect of MDM2 status was observed among individuals harbouring wild-type TP53 (p = 0.039) but not among individuals with TP53 mutated tumors (p>0.5).

conclusionTP53 and CHEK2 mutations were associated with lack of response to epirubicin monotherapy. In contrast, TP53 mutations and MDM2 309G allele status conferred poor disease-specific survival among patients treated with primary paclitaxel but not epirubicin monotherapy.

Indexed as

Genes, p53MutationPromoter Regions, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsBase SequenceBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDNA PrimersEpirubicinFemaleGenotypeHumansPaclitaxelPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Antineoplastic AgentsDNA PrimersEpirubicinMDM2 protein, humanPaclitaxelProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

Identifiers

PMID21556366
PMCPMC3083424
OpenAlexW2136370295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.