Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21556194›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2011

Socioeconomic variation in the prevalence, introduction, retention, and removal of smoke-free policies among smokers: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Brian A King, Andrew J Hyland, Ron Borland, Ann McNeill, K Michael Cummings

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05016505 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Smoke-Free Policy Compliance in Public Housing), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05016505 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Smoke-Free Policy Compliance in Public Housing

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled405ConditionsSmoking, Smoking Cessation, Smoking Reduction, Smoking BehaviorsArmsReduction (relocation and reduction of personal smoking) and cessation, Resident Endorsement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Single-parent status and smoke-free home rules among daily smokers.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Smoke-Free Home and Vehicle Policies Among Community College Smokers.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors Associated with Complete Home Smoking Ban among Chinese Parents of Young Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cohort study of smoke-free homes in economically disadvantaged communities in the Dominican Republic.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Individual, social, and environmental factors associated with support for smoke-free housing policies among subsidized multiunit housing tenants.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Article
  18. "How is smoking handled in your home?": agreement between parental reports on home smoking bans in the United States, 1995-2007.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian A KingDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. brian.alexander.king@gmail.com
Andrew J Hyland
Ron Borland
Ann McNeill
K Michael Cummings

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Christine B. Ambrosone · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Project 3: Policy Effects on Cigarette Design, Emissions &BehaviorP50CA111236 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2004 to 2009
$8.2M
International Tobacco Policy SurveyR01CA100362 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2005 to 2013
$4.7M
Cancer Research UK C312/A3726CIHR 57897CIHR 79551NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA111236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100362NCI NIH HHS R01CA100362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExposure to secondhand smoke causes premature death and disease in non-smokers and indoor smoke-free policies have become increasingly prevalent worldwide. Although socioeconomic disparities have been documented in tobacco use and cessation, the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and smoke-free policies is less well studied.

methodsData were obtained from the 2006 and 2007 Waves of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey (ITC-4), a prospective study of nationally representative samples of smokers in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Telephone interviews were administered to 8,245 current and former adult smokers from October 2006 to February 2007. Between September 2007 and February 2008, 5,866 respondents were re-interviewed. Self-reported education and annual household income were used to create SES tertiles. Outcomes included the presence, introduction, and removal of smoke-free policies in homes, worksites, bars, and restaurants.

resultsSmokers with high SES had increased odds of both having [OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.27-2.87] and introducing [OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.04-2.13] a total ban on smoking in the home compared to low SES smokers. Continuing smokers with high SES also had decreased odds of removing a total ban [OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73]. No consistent association was observed between SES and the presence or introduction of bans in worksites, bars, or restaurants.

conclusionsThe presence, introduction, and retention of smoke-free homes increases with increasing SES, but no consistent socioeconomic variation exists in the presence or introduction of total smoking bans in worksites, bars, or restaurants. Opportunities exist to reduce SES disparities in smoke-free homes, while the lack of socioeconomic differences in public workplace, bar, and restaurant smoke-free policies suggest these measures are now equitably distributed in these four countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildFemaleHousingHumansInternationalityMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPublic PolicyRestaurantsSmokingSocioeconomic FactorsTobacco Smoke PollutionWorkplaceTobacco Smoke PollutionAustraliapublic policysmokingsocioeconomic factorstobacco smoke pollutionUnited KingdomUnited States, Canada

Identifiers

PMID21556194
PMCPMC3084469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.