Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21556146›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Targeting protein-protein interactions for parasite control.

Christina M Taylor, Kerstin Fischer, Sahar Abubucker, Zhengyuan Wang, John Martin, Daojun Jiang, Marc Magliano, Marie-Noëlle Rosso, Ben-Wen Li, Peter U Fischer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proteomic Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Parasite neuropeptide biology: Seeding rational drug target selection?International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina M TaylorDepartment of Genetics, The Genome Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Kerstin Fischer
Sahar Abubucker
Zhengyuan Wang
John Martin
Daojun Jiang
Marc Magliano
Marie-Noëlle Rosso
Ben-Wen Li
Peter U Fischer
Makedonka Mitreva
Washington University in St. Louis · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

COMPARATIVE GENOMICS OF PARASITIC NEMATODESR01AI081803 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MITREVA, MAKEDONKA · 2009 to 2018
$3.1M
COMPARATIVE GENOMICS OF PARASITIC NEMATODESR56AI081803 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MITREVA, MAKEDONKA · 2019 to 2019
$697k
NIAID NIH HHS AI081803NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081803NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI081803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finding new drug targets for pathogenic infections would be of great utility for humanity, as there is a large need to develop new drugs to fight infections due to the developing resistance and side effects of current treatments. Current drug targets for pathogen infections involve only a single protein. However, proteins rarely act in isolation, and the majority of biological processes occur via interactions with other proteins, so protein-protein interactions (PPIs) offer a realm of unexplored potential drug targets and are thought to be the next-generation of drug targets. Parasitic worms were chosen for this study because they have deleterious effects on human health, livestock, and plants, costing society billions of dollars annually and many sequenced genomes are available. In this study, we present a computational approach that utilizes whole genomes of 6 parasitic and 1 free-living worm species and 2 hosts. The species were placed in orthologous groups, then binned in species-specific orthologous groups. Proteins that are essential and conserved among species that span a phyla are of greatest value, as they provide foundations for developing broad-control strategies. Two PPI databases were used to find PPIs within the species specific bins. PPIs with unique helminth proteins and helminth proteins with unique features relative to the host, such as indels, were prioritized as drug targets. The PPIs were scored based on RNAi phenotype and homology to the PDB (Protein DataBank). EST data for the various life stages, GO annotation, and druggability were also taken into consideration. Several PPIs emerged from this study as potential drug targets. A few interactions were supported by co-localization of expression in M. incognita (plant parasite) and B. malayi (H. sapiens parasite), which have extremely different modes of parasitism. As more genomes of pathogens are sequenced and PPI databases expanded, this methodology will become increasingly applicable.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsDatabases, ProteinHelminthiasisHelminth ProteinsHelminthsHumansMarkov ChainsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProtein Structure, SecondarySequence Homology, Amino AcidSpecies SpecificityHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21556146
PMCPMC3083401
OpenAlexW2018210702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.