Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21556027›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2011

Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: understanding the antibodies.

Pier Luigi Meroni, M Orietta Borghi, Elena Raschi, Francesco Tedesco

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 243 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
243citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
31.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

243 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 598 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Association of EndometrialBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. βCurrent opinion in immunology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. C4b-binding protein as an antigenic target in the pathogenesis of antiphosphatidylethanolamine autoantibodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Animal models of antiphospholipid syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review

183 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pier Luigi MeroniDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Milan, Via della Pace 9, 20122 Milan, Italy. pierluigi.meroni@ unimi.it
M Orietta Borghi
Elena Raschi
Francesco Tedesco
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are both diagnostic markers for, and pathogenic drivers of, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Although the presence of aPL is a necessary pre-condition, APS-associated clotting is seemingly triggered by an additional 'second hit', frequently related to innate inflammatory immune responses. β(2) glycoprotein I (β(2)GPI)-dependent aPL, the most important subset of these antibodies, mediate several--not necessarily alternative--thrombogenic mechanisms, mainly on the basis of their reactivity with β(2)GPI expressed on the membrane of cells that participate in the coagulation cascade. Recurrent pregnancy complications associated with aPL cannot be explained solely by thrombosis, and alternative pathogenic mechanisms have been reported. Although one in vivo model of fetal loss suggests a mechanism of aPL-mediated acute placental inflammation, other models and the histopathological examination of APS placentae do not support a widespread inflammatory signature. β(2)GPI-dependent aPL are thought to recognize their antigen on placental tissues, inhibit the growth and differentiation of trophoblasts, and eventually cause defective placentation. Why antibodies with similar antigen specificity produce different clinical manifestations is not clear. Characterization of the molecular basis of the pathogenic mechanisms involved, including the putative second hits and the role of complement activation, might offer an answer to this question.

Indexed as

Antibodies, AntiphospholipidAntiphospholipid SyndromeFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsAntibodies, Antiphospholipid

Identifiers

PMID21556027
OpenAlexW1999555834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.